From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcmcia: ppc64 needs 64-bit ioaddr_t
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:59:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070514225946.GB4191@lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179182824.32247.131.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 08:47:04AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 15:08 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Well that's some pretty sad code you've found there. The kernel
> > surely has
> > some appropriate type to use here without us having to invent a new
> > one.
> > But I suspect if we were to rationalise things in there it will get
> > messy.
>
> There is more sad stuff involved with drivers assuming IO ports fit in
> int. A proper fix for 2.6.23 will be the rework of PIO allocation I'm
> doing. A temporary fix for 2.6.22 would be for Olof to use
> reserve_phb_iospace() to make sure his PIO gets in the low 31 bits. We
> need to add a spinlock to it though.
Yes, we should do fine with just a 32-bit type and my CF driver being
fixed. I've been travelling and catching up with other things today,
I should have something to post tomorrow.
Andrew, you can drop this patch for now. Sorry for the churn.
-Olof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org,
paulus@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcmcia: ppc64 needs 64-bit ioaddr_t
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:59:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070514225946.GB4191@lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179182824.32247.131.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 08:47:04AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 15:08 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Well that's some pretty sad code you've found there. The kernel
> > surely has
> > some appropriate type to use here without us having to invent a new
> > one.
> > But I suspect if we were to rationalise things in there it will get
> > messy.
>
> There is more sad stuff involved with drivers assuming IO ports fit in
> int. A proper fix for 2.6.23 will be the rework of PIO allocation I'm
> doing. A temporary fix for 2.6.22 would be for Olof to use
> reserve_phb_iospace() to make sure his PIO gets in the low 31 bits. We
> need to add a spinlock to it though.
Yes, we should do fine with just a 32-bit type and my CF driver being
fixed. I've been travelling and catching up with other things today,
I should have something to post tomorrow.
Andrew, you can drop this patch for now. Sorry for the churn.
-Olof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-14 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-12 14:31 [PATCH] pcmcia: ppc64 needs 64-bit ioaddr_t Olof Johansson
2007-05-12 14:31 ` Olof Johansson
2007-05-13 21:22 ` Olof Johansson
2007-05-13 21:22 ` Olof Johansson
2007-05-13 21:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-13 21:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-14 22:57 ` Olof Johansson
2007-05-14 22:57 ` Olof Johansson
2007-05-15 5:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-15 5:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-14 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 22:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-14 22:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-14 22:59 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2007-05-14 22:59 ` Olof Johansson
2007-05-15 4:33 ` [PATCH v2] pcmcia: ppc64 needs 32-bit ioaddr_t Olof Johansson
2007-05-15 4:33 ` Olof Johansson
2007-05-15 7:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-15 7:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070514225946.GB4191@lixom.net \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.