Re: [lm-sensors] THMC50 review

[Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>]

On Tue, 22 May 2007 11:34:37 -0700, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
> On 5/22/07, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 May 2007 21:49:26 +0200, Goede, J.W.R. de wrote:
> > > Actually keeping a queue that can be used with people which
> > > have time to review sounds like a plan. I think we should
> > > create a page for this at the trac wiki. Mark AFAIK you've
> > > been collecting reviews, can you create such a page. (I can
> > > do it myself but I don't have a list of everything that
> > > needs reviewing).
> >
> > This certainly doesn't prevent you from creating such a page. If the
> > list is incomplete, it can be completed later, by Mark or others.
> >
> > Note that I am already trying to maintain
> > http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Devices
> > with this information. If you search for "review" on this page, you
> > should find most drivers waiting for a review, with a link to the
> > latest version that was posted.
> 
> This is actually already pretty close to perfect. What would further
> help is another column that shows the assigned reviewer and some way
> to indicate the priority/status. Or should we just use the date as the
> priority and a link to a ticket for status updates?

The concept of priority doesn't hold in our context. Reviews are done
on a voluntary basis. There is no central authority to decide and
impose which driver review has higher priority.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors