From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 00:53:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070531005341.GF85884050@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A019298C6@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 01:11:17PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Hmmm - I wonder if my tree is screwed up in some weird way. I'm seeing link
> > warnings as well:
> >
> > WARNING: init/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.data: from .sdata after 'root_mountflags' (at offset 0x38)
>
> I thought that I'd got the section mis-match warnings down to
> just one (and that was in ACPI code, so I sent a patch to Len
> for it).
>
> Are you building from defconfig, or one of the standard ones?
sn2defconfig + kernel debug option plus xfs options.
> But I've had other complaints that these Section mismatch warnings
> are still showing up in kernels built from the "standard" config
> files (arch/ia64/configs/*) ... which I'm not seeing. So I'm more
> than a little confused about this.
>
> These errors are unlikely to be related to the strace bug that
> you've reported. I'll try to pound on this some more when I'm
> back on the same continent as my test machines.
Ok - no real hurry - they don't appear to be causing me any problems
except build noise....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:53:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070531005341.GF85884050@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A019298C6@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 01:11:17PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Hmmm - I wonder if my tree is screwed up in some weird way. I'm seeing link
> > warnings as well:
> >
> > WARNING: init/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.data: from .sdata after 'root_mountflags' (at offset 0x38)
>
> I thought that I'd got the section mis-match warnings down to
> just one (and that was in ACPI code, so I sent a patch to Len
> for it).
>
> Are you building from defconfig, or one of the standard ones?
sn2defconfig + kernel debug option plus xfs options.
> But I've had other complaints that these Section mismatch warnings
> are still showing up in kernels built from the "standard" config
> files (arch/ia64/configs/*) ... which I'm not seeing. So I'm more
> than a little confused about this.
>
> These errors are unlikely to be related to the strace bug that
> you've reported. I'll try to pound on this some more when I'm
> back on the same continent as my test machines.
Ok - no real hurry - they don't appear to be causing me any problems
except build noise....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-31 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-23 6:31 BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 David Chinner
2007-05-23 6:43 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at Andrew Morton
2007-05-23 6:43 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 Andrew Morton
2007-05-23 17:44 ` Luck, Tony
2007-05-23 17:44 ` Luck, Tony
2007-05-30 3:30 ` David Chinner
2007-05-30 3:30 ` David Chinner
2007-05-30 4:44 ` David Chinner
2007-05-30 4:44 ` David Chinner
2007-05-30 20:11 ` Luck, Tony
2007-05-30 20:11 ` Luck, Tony
2007-05-30 22:39 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at Christoph Lameter
2007-05-30 22:39 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 0:53 ` David Chinner [this message]
2007-05-31 0:53 ` David Chinner
2007-06-04 5:14 ` Peter Chubb
2007-06-04 5:14 ` Peter Chubb
2007-05-30 23:19 ` Luck, Tony
2007-05-30 23:19 ` Luck, Tony
2007-05-30 23:31 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at Christoph Lameter
2007-05-30 23:31 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 Christoph Lameter
2007-05-30 23:34 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at Randy Dunlap
2007-05-30 23:34 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 Randy Dunlap
2007-05-30 23:53 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at Christoph Lameter
2007-05-30 23:53 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 Christoph Lameter
2007-05-30 23:55 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-30 23:55 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-31 0:09 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 0:09 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 6:12 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at Randy Dunlap
2007-05-31 6:12 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 Randy Dunlap
2007-05-31 4:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 4:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-30 23:56 ` Yu, Fenghua
2007-05-30 23:56 ` Yu, Fenghua
2007-05-31 2:37 ` Luck, Tony
2007-05-31 2:37 ` Luck, Tony
2007-05-31 3:19 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 3:19 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 15:20 ` Prarit Bhargava
2007-05-31 15:20 ` Prarit Bhargava
2007-05-31 19:54 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 19:54 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:08 ` [PATCH] net/hp100: fix section mismatch warning Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:17 ` [PATCH] kvm: fix section mismatch warning in kvm-intel.o Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:17 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:24 ` [PATCH] acpi: fix section mismatch warning in asus_acpi.o Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:24 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:29 ` [PATCH] acpi: fix section mismatch warning in asus + toshiba Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:29 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:46 ` [PATCH] isdn: fix section mismatch warnings Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:46 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:51 ` [PATCH] microcode: fix section mismatch warning Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-31 20:42 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at Christoph Lameter
2007-05-31 20:42 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 3:18 ` Luck, Tony
2007-06-01 3:18 ` Luck, Tony
2007-06-01 3:31 ` Prarit Bhargava
2007-06-01 3:31 ` Prarit Bhargava
2007-06-01 4:05 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 4:05 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 4:17 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-06-01 4:17 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-06-01 4:45 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 4:45 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 6:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-06-01 6:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-06-01 8:00 ` Luck, Tony
2007-06-01 8:00 ` Luck, Tony
2007-06-01 10:30 ` Prarit Bhargava
2007-06-01 10:30 ` Prarit Bhargava
2007-06-05 14:55 ` linux-ia64 build warning messages Russ Anderson
2007-06-05 14:55 ` Russ Anderson
2007-06-07 5:00 ` Peter Chubb
2007-06-07 5:00 ` Peter Chubb
2007-06-01 10:37 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 Luck, Tony
2007-06-01 10:37 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070531005341.GF85884050@sgi.com \
--to=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.