From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Syslets - Fix cachemiss_thread return value
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:39:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070531233946.GA12493@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070531220716.GL5488@mami.zabbo.net>
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:07:16PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> Can you explain what motivated you to send out this patch?
>
> It used to return 0. It was changed because, unlike the syslet
> syscalls, sys_io_submit() doesn't have a simple 0 value to indicate
> success. The current implementation wants to return the number of iocbs
> that were processed, including the one which blocked, from the cachemiss
> thread. So before calling into an operation it sets task_ret_ret() so
> that the cachemiss thread can return it if it takes over.
> task_ret_reg() is holding a return value that is being returned by the
> cachemiss thread on behalf of a sys_io_submit() which blocked.
>
> When I made the change I didn't really audit its effect on the other
> paths. I suppose it's time to do that, and you could help by telling me
> if you saw something bad happen :).
The bad thing was sys_async_exec returning -NOSYS every time a new
cachemiss thread was created.
Without this patch, you'll see sys_async_exec failures with either of
the demos I sent out. Dunno about the existing ones, but I bet they do
the same.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Syslets - Fix cachemiss_thread return value
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:39:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070531233946.GA12493@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070531220716.GL5488@mami.zabbo.net>
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:07:16PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> Can you explain what motivated you to send out this patch?
>
> It used to return 0. It was changed because, unlike the syslet
> syscalls, sys_io_submit() doesn't have a simple 0 value to indicate
> success. The current implementation wants to return the number of iocbs
> that were processed, including the one which blocked, from the cachemiss
> thread. So before calling into an operation it sets task_ret_ret() so
> that the cachemiss thread can return it if it takes over.
> task_ret_reg() is holding a return value that is being returned by the
> cachemiss thread on behalf of a sys_io_submit() which blocked.
>
> When I made the change I didn't really audit its effect on the other
> paths. I suppose it's time to do that, and you could help by telling me
> if you saw something bad happen :).
The bad thing was sys_async_exec returning -NOSYS every time a new
cachemiss thread was created.
Without this patch, you'll see sys_async_exec failures with either of
the demos I sent out. Dunno about the existing ones, but I bet they do
the same.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-31 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-31 18:19 [uml-devel] [PATCH] Syslets - Fix cachemiss_thread return value Jeff Dike
2007-05-31 18:19 ` Jeff Dike
2007-05-31 20:09 ` [uml-devel] " Ingo Molnar
2007-05-31 20:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-31 22:07 ` [uml-devel] " Zach Brown
2007-05-31 22:07 ` Zach Brown
2007-05-31 23:39 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2007-05-31 23:39 ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-01 0:00 ` [uml-devel] " Zach Brown
2007-06-01 0:00 ` Zach Brown
2007-06-07 23:27 ` [uml-devel] " Zach Brown
2007-06-07 23:27 ` Zach Brown
2007-06-08 16:10 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2007-06-08 16:10 ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-08 16:26 ` [uml-devel] " Zach Brown
2007-06-08 16:26 ` Zach Brown
2007-06-08 16:33 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2007-06-08 16:33 ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-08 16:46 ` [uml-devel] " Zach Brown
2007-06-08 16:46 ` Zach Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070531233946.GA12493@c2.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.