All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 16:11:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070602141144.GC5500@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706010209.l51299kN000531@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>

On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:09:10PM -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> 
> Explain what we use Acked-by: for, and how it differs from Signed-off-by:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> 
>  Documentation/SubmittingPatches |   15 ++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff -puN Documentation/SubmittingPatches~document-acked-by Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches~document-acked-by
> +++ a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> @@ -328,7 +328,20 @@ now, but you can do this to mark interna
>  point out some special detail about the sign-off. 
>  
>  
> -12) The canonical patch format
> +12) When to use Acked-by:
> +
> +The Signed-off-by: tag implies that the signer was involved in the development
> +of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path.

The last part should be dropped: If "he/she was in the patch's delivery 
path", a Signed-off-by: tag is required.

> +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a
> +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can
> +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog.
> +
> +Acked-by: is often used by the maintainer of the affected code when that
> +maintainer neither wrote, merged nor forwarded the patch themselves.

"merged" seems to be superfluous if you also mention "forwarded".

> +13) The canonical patch format
>  
>  The canonical patch subject line is:

Please mention explicitely whether Acked-by: this now considered a 
formal tag like Signed-off-by:

IOW, if a maintainer says "fine with me", can I translate this to an 
Acked-by: line, or do I now have to ask for an explicit Acked-by: line?

Oh, and that's not a theoretical question, this is a result of a recent 
flamewar^Wdiscussion on this list...

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-02 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-01  2:09 [patch 1/1] document Acked-by: akpm
2007-06-01  5:32 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-06-01  6:10   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-01 10:53     ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2007-06-01 19:27       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-06-01 19:37         ` Scott Preece
2007-06-01 20:00           ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 20:04             ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-02 13:34               ` debian developer
2007-06-02 17:13                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-02 19:34                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-06-01 22:10           ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-06-01 22:17             ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-01 22:42               ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-06-02  0:37                 ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2007-06-02  0:56                   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-06-02  1:36             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-06-01 17:27     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-06-01 17:35       ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 18:14 ` Dave Jones
2007-06-01 18:22   ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 18:28     ` Dave Jones
2007-06-02 17:17       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-02 18:00         ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2007-06-02 19:07           ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-06-02 14:11 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-06-02 17:47   ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-02 17:55     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-03  0:23     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-06-03  2:57     ` Scott Preece
2007-06-03  4:06       ` Randy Dunlap
2007-06-03  4:15         ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-03 18:31           ` Scott Preece

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070602141144.GC5500@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.