All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/9] Conditional Calls - i386 Optimization
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:02:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070605190200.GB11996@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73r6oxcd47.fsf@bingen.suse.de>

* Andi Kleen (andi@firstfloor.org) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> writes:
> 
> > +#define cond_call_optimized(flags, name, func) \
> > +	({ \
> > +		static const char __cstrtab_name_##name[] \
> > +		__attribute__((section("__cond_call_strings"))) = #name; \
> > +		char condition; \
> > +		asm (	".section __cond_call, \"a\", @progbits;\n\t" \
> > +					".long %1, 0f, %2;\n\t" \
> > +					".previous;\n\t" \
> > +					".align 2\n\t" \
> > +					"0:\n\t" \
> > +					"movb %3,%0;\n\t" \
> > +				: "=r" (condition) \
> > +				: "m" (*__cstrtab_name_##name), \
> > +				  "m" (*(char*)flags), \
> > +				  "i" ((flags) & CF_STATIC_ENABLE)); \
> 
> Remind me what we need the flags again for? 
> 
> I would prefer to just eliminate them and always require arming.
> 

The CF_STATIC_ENABLE could be used to have a cond_call compiled as
active, and could be later desactivated dynamically. Since I don't see
much use to this, I will remove this flag.


> 
> > +		(likely(!condition)) ? \
> > +			(__typeof__(func))0 : \
> > +			(func); \
> > +	})
> > +
> > +/* cond_call macro selecting the generic or optimized version of cond_call,
> > + * depending on the flags specified. */
> > +#define _cond_call(flags, name, func) \
> > +({ \
> > +	(((flags) & CF_LOCKDEP) && ((flags) & CF_OPTIMIZED)) ? \
> 
> Similar here? unoptimized condcalls don't make much sense.
> I also don't understand what the LOCKDEP flag is good for.
> 

unoptimized condcalls will now be a simple static variable usage (since
the new condcalls will simply be an infrastructure for synchronizing a
static variable with load immediates).


> > Index: linux-2.6-lttng/arch/i386/kernel/condcall.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- /dev/null	1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/arch/i386/kernel/condcall.c	2007-05-17 01:52:38.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
> > +/* condcall.c
> > + *
> > + * - Erratum 49 fix for Intel PIII.
> > + * - Still present on newer processors : Intel Core 2 Duo Processor for Intel
> > + *   Centrino Duo Processor Technology Specification Update, AH33.
> > + *   Unsynchronized Cross-Modifying Code Operations Can Cause Unexpected
> > + *   Instruction Execution Results.
> 
> Can you please define a generic utility function to do self modifying
> code? There are other places that do it too.
> 

If you are talking about paravirt ops, they seem to only modify code
on the 1st CPU before other CPUs are turned on. But I might be wrong.

Also, there are 2 simplifications here which do not address the general
case. Those simplifications are done so I can use the cond_calls within
the markers in as many code paths as possible.

1 - When the breakpoint is used (x86), I simply skip the load immediate
instead of single-stepping the instruction. I can do this because I know
that the only effect that the load immediate has is to populate a
register. Since I make sure that I am doing a transition 0 <-> !0, I can
afford leaving this register in an unknown state during the transition.

2 - In order to patch the code on other architectures too, I have to
provide atomic instruction modification. It heavily depends on the
instruction size and their alignment. Once again, I would have to use
breakpoints and single-stepping to replace the instructions (in every
architecture), instead of doing a simple operation replacement with
memcpy.

Because I control the alignment and size of the instructions I replace,
I do not depend on breakpoints (except on x86-like architectures), which
makes things much more solid reentrancy-wise and lets me use the
condcalls within the markers in tricky code paths.

> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(cond_call_mutex);
> 
> All locks need a comment describing what they protect and the hierarchy if 
> any.
> 
ok

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-05 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-30 14:00 [patch 0/9] Conditional Calls - for 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 1/9] Conditional Calls - Architecture Independent Code Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:32   ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 16:34     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 13:47   ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-05 18:40     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-04 19:01   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-13 15:57     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-13 21:51       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-14 16:02         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-14 21:06           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-20 21:59             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-21 13:00               ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-21 13:55                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:32   ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 13:42   ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 16:08     ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-01 16:46       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 17:07         ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-01 17:45           ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 18:06             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 18:49               ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-01 19:35               ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 20:33                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 20:44                   ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-04 22:26                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 18:03           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 3/9] Conditional Calls - Non Optimized Architectures Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 4/9] Conditional Calls - Add kconfig menus Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 5/9] Conditional Calls - i386 Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:33   ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 13:54   ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-05 19:02     ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 6/9] Conditional Calls - PowerPC Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 7/9] Conditional Calls - Documentation Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 8/9] F00F bug fixup for i386 - use conditional calls Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:33   ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 21:07     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 21:21       ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 21:38         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 9/9] Scheduler profiling - Use " Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:34   ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 15:54     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 16:19       ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 16:33         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:59   ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-31 21:12     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 23:41       ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-06-04 22:20         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 21:44   ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-31 21:36     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 13:39   ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 22:07     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 22:33       ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-04 22:20         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-29 18:33 [patch 0/9] Conditional Calls Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-29 18:34 ` [patch 5/9] Conditional Calls - i386 Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070605190200.GB11996@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.