From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/9] Conditional Calls - Architecture Independent Code
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:51:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070613215104.GK3588@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070613155724.GA8703@Krystal>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:57:24AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Mathieu,
>...
> > 2. What is the real-life performance improvement?
> > That micro benchmarks comparing cache hits with cache misses give great
> > looking numbers is obvious.
> > But what will be the performance improvement in real workloads after the
> > functions you plan to make conditional according to question 1 have been
> > made conditional?
>
> Hrm, I am trying to get interesting numbers out of lmbench: I just ran a
> test on a kernel sprinkled with about 50 markers at important sites
> (LTTng markers: system call entry/exit, traps, interrupt handlers, ...).
> The markers are compiled-in, but in "disabled state". Since the markers
> re-use the cond_call infrastructure, each marker has its own cond_call.
>...
> The results are that we really cannot tell that one is faster/slower
> than the other; the standard deviation is much higher than the
> difference between the two situations.
>
> Note that lmbench is a workload that will not trigger much L1 cache
> stress, since it repeats the same tests many times. Do you have any
> suggestion of a test that would be more representative of a real
> diversified (in term of in-kernel locality of reference) workload ?
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think 50 markers couldn't ever
result in a visible change:
You need a change that is big enough that it has a measurable influence
on the cache hit ratio.
I don't think you could get any measurable influence unless you get into
areas where > 10% of all code are conditional. And that's a percentage
I wouldn't consider being realistically.
And one big disadvantage of your implementation is the dependency on
MODULES. If you build all driver statically into the kernel, switching
from CONFIG_MODULES=y to CONFIG_MODULES=n already gives you for free a
functionally equivalent kernel that is smaller by at about 8% (depending
on the .config).
My impression is that your patches would add an infrastructure for a
nice sounding idea that will never have any real life effect.
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-13 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-30 14:00 [patch 0/9] Conditional Calls - for 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 1/9] Conditional Calls - Architecture Independent Code Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:32 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 16:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 13:47 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-05 18:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-04 19:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-13 15:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-13 21:51 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-06-14 16:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-14 21:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-20 21:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-21 13:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-21 13:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:32 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 13:42 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 16:08 ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-01 16:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 17:07 ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-01 17:45 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 18:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 18:49 ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-01 19:35 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 20:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 20:44 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-04 22:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 18:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 3/9] Conditional Calls - Non Optimized Architectures Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 4/9] Conditional Calls - Add kconfig menus Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 5/9] Conditional Calls - i386 Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 13:54 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-05 19:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 6/9] Conditional Calls - PowerPC Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 7/9] Conditional Calls - Documentation Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 8/9] F00F bug fixup for i386 - use conditional calls Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 21:07 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 21:21 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 21:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 9/9] Scheduler profiling - Use " Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 15:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 16:19 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 16:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-31 21:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 23:41 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-06-04 22:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 21:44 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-31 21:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 13:39 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 22:07 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 22:33 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-04 22:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-29 18:33 [patch 0/9] Conditional Calls Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-29 18:33 ` [patch 1/9] Conditional Calls - Architecture Independent Code Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070613215104.GK3588@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.