* [LARTC] EM64T and network performance
@ 2007-06-11 14:19 Anton Glinkov
2007-06-11 14:31 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Anton Glinkov @ 2007-06-11 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hello,
Will switchning to 64bit distribution (intel EM64T) provide any
performance gain to the networking code: routing (lots of rules and big
routing tables), scheduling (htb) and iptables?
Thank you.
--
Anton Glinkov
network administrator
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] EM64T and network performance
2007-06-11 14:19 [LARTC] EM64T and network performance Anton Glinkov
@ 2007-06-11 14:31 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marek Kierdelewicz @ 2007-06-11 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
>Hello,
Hi,
>Will switchning to 64bit distribution (intel EM64T) provide any
>performance gain to the networking code: routing (lots of rules and big
>routing tables), scheduling (htb) and iptables?
You can have 64bit kernel on 32bit distro. Network traffic is
processed in kernelspace, so system libraries (32-bit or 64-bit)
won't be relevant.
I'm curious myself about 64-bit vs 32-bit network performance
comparison.
cheers,
Marek Kierdelewicz
KoBa ISP
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-06-11 14:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-11 14:19 [LARTC] EM64T and network performance Anton Glinkov
2007-06-11 14:31 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.