From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Btrfs: a copy on write, snapshotting FS
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:35:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070613103522.GW28279@think.oraclecorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18031.26764.586958.632146@stoffel.org>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:46:20PM -0400, John Stoffel wrote:
> >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> writes:
>
> Chris> After the last FS summit, I started working on a new filesystem
> Chris> that maintains checksums of all file data and metadata. Many
> Chris> thanks to Zach Brown for his ideas, and to Dave Chinner for his
> Chris> help on benchmarking analysis.
>
> Chris> The basic list of features looks like this:
>
> Chris> * Extent based file storage (2^64 max file size)
> Chris> * Space efficient packing of small files
> Chris> * Space efficient indexed directories
> Chris> * Dynamic inode allocation
> Chris> * Writable snapshots
> Chris> * Subvolumes (separate internal filesystem roots)
> Chris> - Object level mirroring and striping
> Chris> * Checksums on data and metadata (multiple algorithms available)
> Chris> - Strong integration with device mapper for multiple device support
> Chris> - Online filesystem check
> Chris> * Very fast offline filesystem check
> Chris> - Efficient incremental backup and FS mirroring
>
> So, can you resize a filesystem both bigger and smaller? Or is that
> implicit in the Object level mirroring and striping?
Growing the FS is just either extending or adding a new extent tree.
Shrinking is more complex. The extent trees do have back pointers to
the objectids that own the extent, but snapshotting makes that a little
non-deterministic. The good news is there are no fixed locations for
any of the metadata. So it is at least possible to shrink and pop out
arbitrary chunks.
>
> As a user of Netapps, having quotas (if only for reporting purposes)
> and some way to migrate non-used files to slower/cheaper storage would
> be great.
So far, I'm not planning quotas beyond the subvolume level.
>
> Ie. being able to setup two pools, one being RAID6, the other being
> RAID1, where all currently accessed files are in the RAID1 setup, but
> if un-used get migrated to the RAID6 area.
HSM in general is definitely interesting. I'm afraid it is a long ways
off, but it could be integrated into the scrubber that wanders the trees
in the background.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-13 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-12 16:10 [ANNOUNCE] Btrfs: a copy on write, snapshotting FS Chris Mason
2007-06-12 19:53 ` Mike Snitzer
2007-06-12 20:14 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-13 3:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-13 10:17 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-13 3:46 ` John Stoffel
2007-06-13 10:35 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2007-06-13 14:00 ` John Stoffel
2007-06-13 14:54 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-13 16:12 ` John Stoffel
2007-06-13 16:34 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-13 16:25 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2007-06-14 18:20 ` Chuck Lever
2007-06-14 18:48 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-15 17:17 ` Chuck Lever
2007-06-14 18:29 ` Florian D.
2007-06-14 19:13 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-15 19:08 ` Florian D.
2007-06-15 19:11 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-15 20:46 ` Florian D.
2007-06-15 20:51 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-15 22:03 ` Florian D.
2007-06-16 0:54 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-16 9:31 ` Florian D.
2007-06-18 14:29 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-18 14:41 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-18 14:41 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-18 17:37 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-06-18 20:08 ` John Stoffel
2007-06-19 9:11 ` Pádraig Brady
2007-06-19 10:01 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-06-19 18:20 ` david
2007-06-20 8:41 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-06-19 12:04 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-19 12:04 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-19 14:00 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-06-19 14:00 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-06-19 18:24 ` david
2007-06-19 18:28 ` Philipp Matthias Hahn
2007-06-19 18:28 ` Philipp Matthias Hahn
2007-06-20 8:44 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-06-20 9:18 ` Ph. Marek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-13 5:45 Albert Cahalan
2007-06-13 12:00 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-13 16:14 ` Albert Cahalan
2007-06-13 16:57 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-14 6:59 ` Albert Cahalan
2007-06-14 12:30 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070613103522.GW28279@think.oraclecorp.com \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=john@stoffel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.