From: amateur <tianlei.zhao@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] CPUTLBEntry Question
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:41:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070614134136.GA6825@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <812074ac0706131325t578dfd5eiaa5836b160a24679@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 04:25:07PM -0400, Ryan Riley wrote:
> typedef struct CPUTLBEntry {
> /* bit 31 to TARGET_PAGE_BITS : virtual address
> bit TARGET_PAGE_BITS-1..IO_MEM_SHIFT : if non zero, memory io
> zone number
> bit 3 : indicates that the entry is invalid
> bit 2..0 : zero
> */
> target_ulong addr_read;
> target_ulong addr_write;
> target_ulong addr_code;
> /* addend to virtual address to get physical address */
> target_phys_addr_t addend;
> } CPUTLBEntry;
>
> If I change it to add another member, like so..
>
> typedef struct CPUTLBEntry {
> /* New member */
> target_phys_addr_t blah;
> } CPUTLBEntry;
>
> then QEMU crashes on startup. (It also crashes if I put that blah
> entry on the beginning instead of the end.) I'm sure there's code
> somewhere that must be making assumptions about the size of TLB entry,
> but I'm at a loss for finding it. (I have noticed that the assembly
> code in softmmu_header.h indexes to the addend based on addr_read or
> addr_write, but adding a new member to the end of the structure
> shouldn't impact that, right?)
-------------------------
The softmmu_header.h code does assume each TLB entry has a fixed size
of (2^CPU_TLB_ENTRY_BITS) bytes. Not only the assembly code, but also
the C code assume this. So if you want to add new members into
CPUTLBEntry, add the new member at the end of the data structure, and
adjust CPU_TLB_ENTRY_BITS accordingly.
Best Regards
Tianlei Zhao
--
Don't look back, the lemmings are gaining on you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-14 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-13 20:25 [Qemu-devel] CPUTLBEntry Question Ryan Riley
2007-06-14 13:22 ` Paul Brook
2007-06-14 19:31 ` Ryan Riley
2007-06-14 13:41 ` amateur [this message]
2007-06-14 14:00 ` Blue Swirl
2007-06-15 1:47 ` amateur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070614134136.GA6825@163.com \
--to=tianlei.zhao@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.