From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: SLUB Allocator?
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:31:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070625103116.GA31489@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706211241290.31303@p34.internal.lan>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:42:03PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Is there any XFS filesystem performance benefit using the new SLUB
> allocator?
/me shrugs
When it grows memory defrag of caches, yes. Otherwise I can't
see there being any noticable difference.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-25 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-21 16:42 SLUB Allocator? Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 10:31 ` David Chinner [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-24 20:32 Justin Piszcz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070625103116.GA31489@sgi.com \
--to=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.