* SLUB Allocator?
@ 2007-06-21 16:42 Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 10:31 ` David Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Justin Piszcz @ 2007-06-21 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
Is there any XFS filesystem performance benefit using the new SLUB
allocator?
Justin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* SLUB Allocator?
@ 2007-06-24 20:32 Justin Piszcz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Justin Piszcz @ 2007-06-24 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Alan Piszcz
Is there any XFS filesystem performance benefit using the new SLUB
allocator? What types of workloads would using the SLUB allocator be
beneficial?
Justin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: SLUB Allocator?
2007-06-21 16:42 SLUB Allocator? Justin Piszcz
@ 2007-06-25 10:31 ` David Chinner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Chinner @ 2007-06-25 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Justin Piszcz; +Cc: xfs
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:42:03PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Is there any XFS filesystem performance benefit using the new SLUB
> allocator?
/me shrugs
When it grows memory defrag of caches, yes. Otherwise I can't
see there being any noticable difference.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-06-25 10:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-21 16:42 SLUB Allocator? Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 10:31 ` David Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-24 20:32 Justin Piszcz
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.