From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 4/5] UML - Simplify helper stack handling
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:07:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070626150747.5110e614.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070626215328.GA23077@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:53:28 -0400
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 01:35:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > sprintf(title, data->title, data->device);
> > > - pid = run_helper(NULL, NULL, argv, NULL);
> > > + pid = run_helper(NULL, NULL, argv);
> > > if (pid < 0) {
> > > err = pid;
> > > printk(UM_KERN_ERR "xterm_open : run_helper failed, "
> >
> > Something's gone wrong here. My copy of this file has
> >
> > pid = run_helper(NULL, NULL, argv, &stack);
>
> Looks like you're applying patches out of order.
Yes, I am. After a few days off and a few more days being lazy I have
600-odd patches (and followups thereto) to process.
- If I do them in-order, I merge stuff which is out of date or wrong
- If I do them in reverse-order, I can miss dependencies.
On balance, reverse-order seems to be better.
> This is from the
> 14th, while a patch from the 13th ("UML - xterm driver tidying") has
> - pid = run_helper(NULL, NULL, argv, &stack);
> ...
> + pid = run_helper(NULL, NULL, argv, NULL);
>
> If you don't want to fiddle with this, just drop it and I'll rediff
> against the next -mm and resend.
I sorted it out, thanks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 4/5] UML - Simplify helper stack handling
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:07:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070626150747.5110e614.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070626215328.GA23077@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:53:28 -0400
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 01:35:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > sprintf(title, data->title, data->device);
> > > - pid = run_helper(NULL, NULL, argv, NULL);
> > > + pid = run_helper(NULL, NULL, argv);
> > > if (pid < 0) {
> > > err = pid;
> > > printk(UM_KERN_ERR "xterm_open : run_helper failed, "
> >
> > Something's gone wrong here. My copy of this file has
> >
> > pid = run_helper(NULL, NULL, argv, &stack);
>
> Looks like you're applying patches out of order.
Yes, I am. After a few days off and a few more days being lazy I have
600-odd patches (and followups thereto) to process.
- If I do them in-order, I merge stuff which is out of date or wrong
- If I do them in reverse-order, I can miss dependencies.
On balance, reverse-order seems to be better.
> This is from the
> 14th, while a patch from the 13th ("UML - xterm driver tidying") has
> - pid = run_helper(NULL, NULL, argv, &stack);
> ...
> + pid = run_helper(NULL, NULL, argv, NULL);
>
> If you don't want to fiddle with this, just drop it and I'll rediff
> against the next -mm and resend.
I sorted it out, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-26 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-14 20:26 [uml-devel] [PATCH 4/5] UML - Simplify helper stack handling Jeff Dike
2007-06-14 20:26 ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-26 20:35 ` [uml-devel] " Andrew Morton
2007-06-26 20:35 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-26 21:53 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2007-06-26 21:53 ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-26 22:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-06-26 22:07 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-28 6:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-28 6:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-03 15:28 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2007-07-03 15:28 ` Blaisorblade
2007-07-03 15:58 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-03 15:58 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-03 17:26 ` Jeff Dike
2007-07-03 17:26 ` Jeff Dike
2007-08-05 20:41 ` Luca Tettamanti
2007-08-05 20:54 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070626150747.5110e614.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.