All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot-Users] CONFIG_CMD_* transition and other config changes
@ 2007-07-06  7:54 Matthias Fuchs
  2007-07-06  9:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Fuchs @ 2007-07-06  7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hi,

how should I handle this situation:

1) I plan to update our board configs to the new CONFIG_CMD_* style.
2) I have a couple of patches that update our boards to use
   the new NAND subsystem instead of the legacy NAND stuff.

Do I have to post the CONFIG_CMD series of patches against u-boot-testing 
and the NAND patches against the main repository? Or should I post the 
NAND related patches aginast main repository first and COFNIG_CMD patches
that also contain the NAND stuff? So both patches for each board have the 
NAND stuff in common?

Thanks for advice

Matthias

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Ing. Matthias Fuchs             esd electronic system design gmbh
http://www.esd-electronics.com                    Vahrenwalder Str. 207
phone: +49-511-37298-0, fax: -68                30165 Hannover, Germany
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] CONFIG_CMD_* transition and other config changes
  2007-07-06  7:54 [U-Boot-Users] CONFIG_CMD_* transition and other config changes Matthias Fuchs
@ 2007-07-06  9:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2007-07-06  9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

In message <200707060954.45223.matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com> you wrote:
> 
> how should I handle this situation:
> 
> 1) I plan to update our board configs to the new CONFIG_CMD_* style.
> 2) I have a couple of patches that update our boards to use
>    the new NAND subsystem instead of the legacy NAND stuff.

Sounds like being two independent steps to bme, so please create
orthogonal patches, too.

> Do I have to post the CONFIG_CMD series of patches against u-boot-testing 
> and the NAND patches against the main repository? Or should I post the 

Yes, that sounds logical to me.

> NAND related patches aginast main repository first and COFNIG_CMD patches
> that also contain the NAND stuff? So both patches for each board have the 
> NAND stuff in common?

These things are independet of each other.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
No journaling file system can recover your data if the disk dies.
                                 - Steve Rago in <D4Cw1p.L9E@plc.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-06  9:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-06  7:54 [U-Boot-Users] CONFIG_CMD_* transition and other config changes Matthias Fuchs
2007-07-06  9:06 ` Wolfgang Denk

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.