From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zwane@infradead.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@pol.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] retrieve VBE EDID/DDC info independent of used video mode
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 21:48:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707082148.04803.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070708111404.1486e73c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Sunday 08 July 2007 20:14:04 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 09:27:55 -0400 Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:25:31 -0400 Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > >> This patch solves a 2.6.20.11 (and 2.6.21) regression added by the patch
> > >> titled "x86: Don't probe for DDC on VBE1.2"
> > >>
> > >> The regression caused the screen resolution to be incorrectly adjusted
> > >> by 6 pixels. This patch makes it go back to normal again.
> > >>
> > >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181067
> > >>
> > >> Please apply this patch or discuss further :)
> > >
> > > Well drat. I didn't merge the patch because it conflicts with
> > > git-newsetup, and Peter believes that git-newsetup already contains an
> > > equivalent fix. Testing 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 would confirm that. Please.
> >
> > 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 has the same problem (it is not fixed there).
> >
>
> Well damn, we've let this slide for too long.
>
> Guys, 2.6.22 is days away. Do we think that the below is safe to merge
> now?
I feel uneasy with the patch that late and i don't think the bug is
particularly critical.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-08 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-19 15:57 [PATCH] retrieve VBE EDID/DDC info independent of used video mode Jan Beulich
2007-06-30 22:25 ` Daniel Drake
2007-06-30 22:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-08 13:27 ` Daniel Drake
2007-07-08 18:14 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-08 18:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-09 22:53 ` Daniel Drake
2007-07-09 22:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-10 17:16 ` Daniel Drake
2007-07-10 17:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-10 18:07 ` Daniel Drake
2007-07-10 18:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-31 23:58 ` Daniel Drake
2007-08-01 0:21 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2007-08-01 1:17 ` Daniel Drake
2007-08-01 1:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-01 1:54 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-08-01 2:08 ` Gabriel C
2007-08-02 3:09 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-08-02 3:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-02 10:16 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-08-02 13:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-03 2:33 ` Daniel Drake
2007-08-03 3:33 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-08-01 1:04 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-07-08 19:48 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-07-09 1:10 ` Daniel Drake
2007-07-09 0:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-02 20:13 ` Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200707082148.04803.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=adaplas@pol.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zwane@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.