From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mschwid2@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
efault@gmx.de, dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org,
anton@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:38:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070719193840.GA29523@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1184872821.5516.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > still, CFS needs time measurement across idle periods as well, for
> > another purpose: to be able to do precise task statistics for /proc.
> > (for top, ps, etc.) So it's still true that sched_clock() should
> > include idle periods too.
>
> I'm not sure, s390 already has an implemetation for precise accounting
> in the architecture code, does CFS also improve accounting data?
what kind of precise accounting does s390 have in the architecture code?
CFS changes task (and load) accounting to be sched_clock() driven in
essence.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-19 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-19 10:57 [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390 Jan Glauber
2007-07-19 15:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-19 15:48 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-07-19 16:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 19:20 ` Jan Glauber
2007-07-19 19:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-07-19 21:07 ` Jan Glauber
2007-07-20 1:01 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-07-20 6:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-20 7:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-23 9:15 ` Jan Glauber
2007-07-23 13:24 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070719193840.GA29523@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mschwid2@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.