From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Yasushi SHOJI <yashi@atmark-techno.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] describe: add option --dirty
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 02:59:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070723065912.GG32566@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87odi3mxtl.wl@mail2.atmark-techno.com>
Yasushi SHOJI <yashi@atmark-techno.com> wrote:
> when --dirty is given, git describe will check the working tree and
> append "-dirty" to describe string if the tree is dirty.
> ---
> I'm not sure this is good idea or the current way (using diff-index in
> shell script) is more prefered.
Yea, I'm actually torn on this. A lot of people like the output of
git-describe for versions (where a lot is at least me!) and yet I
also always tack in the -dirty if the directory is dirty according
to diff-index. So having this built right into git-describe is
actually quite handy. It simplifies a little bit of build rule
logic.
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-describe.txt b/Documentation/git-describe.txt
> @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ OPTIONS
> being employed to standard error. The tag name will still
> be printed to standard out.
>
> +--dirty::
> + Append "-dirty" to describe string if working tree is dirty.
> +
It requires a working directory. Running this in a bare repository
with --dirty won't work. You might want to discuss that in the
documentation.
> diff --git a/builtin-describe.c b/builtin-describe.c
> @@ -229,12 +231,23 @@ static void describe(const char *arg, int last_one)
> sha1_to_hex(gave_up_on->object.sha1));
> }
> }
> + if (check_dirty) {
> + const char **args = xmalloc(5 * sizeof(char*));
> + args[0] = "diff-index";
> + args[1] = "--quiet";
> + args[2] = "--name-only";
> + args[3] = "HEAD";
> + args[4] = NULL;
> + if (cmd_diff_index(4, args, prefix))
> + dirty_string = "-dirty";
> + }
So if I describe two different commits at once in the same working
tree you are going to run diff-index twice? That's not a great idea.
The outcome of diff-index won't change between those two commits.
Better to compute this up front before calling the describe()
function, and instead of passing in prefix pass in dirty_string.
Or just make it a global, like you did to the option flag.
> if (abbrev == 0)
> - printf("%s\n", all_matches[0].name->path );
> + printf("%s%s\n", all_matches[0].name->path, dirty_string);
> else
> - printf("%s-%d-g%s\n", all_matches[0].name->path,
> + printf("%s-%d-g%s%s\n", all_matches[0].name->path,
> all_matches[0].depth,
> - find_unique_abbrev(cmit->object.sha1, abbrev));
> + find_unique_abbrev(cmit->object.sha1, abbrev),
> + dirty_string);
>
> if (!last_one)
> clear_commit_marks(cmit, -1);
So if HEAD is exactly matching a tag you don't output the -dirty
suffix, even if the working tree is dirty? That's counter to the
documentation above. See l.150-154, we break out of the describe
function very quickly if there is a tag on the input commit.
--
Shawn.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-23 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-23 6:35 [RFC] describe: add option --dirty Yasushi SHOJI
2007-07-23 6:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-07-23 7:08 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-07-23 7:54 ` Yasushi SHOJI
2007-07-23 7:58 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-07-23 8:52 ` Yasushi SHOJI
2007-07-23 6:59 ` Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070723065912.GG32566@spearce.org \
--to=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yashi@atmark-techno.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.