All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	stable@kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:04:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070725090439.GA26286@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070725020003.63144fd6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>


* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> >  softlockup-add-irq-regs-h.patch
> >  softlockup-better-printout.patch
> >  softlockup-cleanups.patch
> >  softlockup-use-cpu-clock.patch
> > 
> > they are all necessary.
> 
> I think I have.  Seems that someone hasn't been naming their patches
> consistently (which is quite irksome).  I have:
> 
> fix-the-softlockup-watchdog-to-actually-work.patch
> softlockup-make-asm-irq_regsh-available-on-every-platform.patch
> softlockup-improve-debug-output.patch
> softlockup-watchdog-style-cleanups.patch
> softlockup-add-a-proc-tuning-parameter.patch
> softlockup-add-a-proc-tuning-parameter-fix.patch

you have the key one missing i think - attached below.

	Ingo

------------------------------------>
Subject: softlockup: use cpu_clock() instead of sched_clock()
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

sched_clock() is not a reliable time-source, use cpu_clock() instead.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/softlockup.c |   10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux/kernel/softlockup.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ linux/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -42,14 +42,16 @@ static struct notifier_block panic_block
  * resolution, and we don't need to waste time with a big divide when
  * 2^30ns == 1.074s.
  */
-static unsigned long get_timestamp(void)
+static unsigned long get_timestamp(int this_cpu)
 {
-	return sched_clock() >> 30;  /* 2^30 ~= 10^9 */
+	return cpu_clock(this_cpu) >> 30;  /* 2^30 ~= 10^9 */
 }
 
 void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
 {
-	__raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = get_timestamp();
+	int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+
+	per_cpu(touch_timestamp, this_cpu) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_softlockup_watchdog);
 
@@ -95,7 +97,7 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	now = get_timestamp();
+	now = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
 
 	/* Wake up the high-prio watchdog task every second: */
 	if (now > (touch_timestamp + 1))

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-25  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-17 11:44 [patch] softlockup watchdog: fix Xen bogosity Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 14:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-17 15:49   ` [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 17:03     ` Randy Dunlap
2007-07-17 17:25       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 18:14       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-17 21:38         ` Randy Dunlap
2007-07-19  7:22     ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-19  7:46       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19  7:51       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 14:31         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-19 14:35           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 14:40             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-19 14:46             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-19 14:50               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:04                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-19 15:09                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:21                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-19 15:42                       ` [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time source Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:44                         ` [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time source, take #2 Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 16:11                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-19 16:16                             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 16:18                               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-19 16:21                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 16:29                                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-19 17:24                             ` Jens Axboe
2007-07-19 18:10                               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-19 18:20                                 ` Jens Axboe
2007-07-25  8:49     ` [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work Andrew Morton
2007-07-25  8:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-25  8:55         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-25  9:00         ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-25  9:04           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-07-25  9:17             ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-25  9:23               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-25  9:59                 ` Jens Axboe
2007-07-25 11:04                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-25 11:06                     ` Jens Axboe
2007-07-25 16:34       ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-03 23:49     ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070725090439.GA26286@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.