From: Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com, ataraid-list@redhat.com, linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Re: LVM on dmraid breakage
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 21:57:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070803195749.GA27271@percy.comedia.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46B36F7A.2090601@cfl.rr.com>
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:10:02PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
>I agree with moving the partition detection code to user space, but
>trying to undo it after the fact doesn't help because udev is already
>processing the add events. Also you do not need to remove the
>partitions so long as pvscan understands that it shouldn't be using them.
which is the modification i proposed to lvm tools, isn't it?
>Udev is supposed to be the new model for enumerating devices and
i know that, and i will withdraw from this discussion, since it might
get to an useless flame war.
Is there any technical reason for not having lvm tools filter out devices that
are used by device mapper?
besides dmraid, think of multipath.
Regards,
L.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com, ataraid-list@redhat.com, linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] Re: LVM on dmraid breakage
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 21:57:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070803195749.GA27271@percy.comedia.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46B36F7A.2090601@cfl.rr.com>
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:10:02PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
>I agree with moving the partition detection code to user space, but
>trying to undo it after the fact doesn't help because udev is already
>processing the add events. Also you do not need to remove the
>partitions so long as pvscan understands that it shouldn't be using them.
which is the modification i proposed to lvm tools, isn't it?
>Udev is supposed to be the new model for enumerating devices and
i know that, and i will withdraw from this discussion, since it might
get to an useless flame war.
Is there any technical reason for not having lvm tools filter out devices that
are used by device mapper?
besides dmraid, think of multipath.
Regards,
L.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-03 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-01 20:19 LVM on dmraid breakage Phillip Susi
2007-08-01 20:29 ` Jonathan Brassow
2007-08-01 21:19 ` Phillip Susi
2007-08-01 21:44 ` Jonathan Brassow
2007-08-01 22:12 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2007-08-02 6:50 ` Luca Berra
2007-08-02 6:50 ` [linux-lvm] " Luca Berra
2007-08-02 10:45 ` Bryn M. Reeves
2007-08-02 10:45 ` [linux-lvm] " Bryn M. Reeves
2007-08-02 21:50 ` Phillip Susi
2007-08-03 0:40 ` David Robinson
2007-08-03 0:40 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " David Robinson
2007-08-07 21:37 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:37 ` [linux-lvm] " Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-08 21:00 ` Phillip Susi
2007-08-07 21:03 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:03 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-08 21:04 ` Phillip Susi
2007-08-08 21:45 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-08 21:45 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-09 17:27 ` Phillip Susi
2007-08-10 5:09 ` Luca Berra
2007-08-10 5:09 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " Luca Berra
2007-08-10 13:49 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-10 13:49 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-10 20:15 ` Phillip Susi
2007-08-03 7:55 ` [linux-lvm] " Luca Berra
2007-08-02 22:04 ` Phillip Susi
2007-08-03 8:11 ` Luca Berra
2007-08-03 8:11 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " Luca Berra
2007-08-03 18:10 ` Phillip Susi
2007-08-03 19:57 ` Luca Berra [this message]
2007-08-03 19:57 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " Luca Berra
2007-08-03 21:30 ` Phillip Susi
2007-08-04 6:50 ` [dm-devel] " Luca Berra
2007-08-04 6:50 ` [linux-lvm] " Luca Berra
2007-08-06 14:45 ` Phillip Susi
2007-08-07 9:17 ` Luca Berra
2007-08-07 9:17 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " Luca Berra
2007-08-07 15:58 ` Phillip Susi
2007-08-07 22:01 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 22:01 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-08 21:06 ` Phillip Susi
2007-08-07 21:53 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:53 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:50 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:50 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:40 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:40 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:28 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:28 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-08 21:13 ` Phillip Susi
2007-08-07 21:02 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 21:02 ` [linux-lvm] " Alasdair G Kergon
2007-08-07 20:52 ` Alasdair G Kergon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070803195749.GA27271@percy.comedia.it \
--to=bluca@comedia.it \
--cc=ataraid-list@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.