From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: trenn@suse.de, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.22 regression: thermal trip points
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:58:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708071458.45687.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070806095504.GA1934@elf.ucw.cz>
On Monday 06 August 2007 05:55, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > For the
> > upstream kernel, I think it is more appropriate to expose and fix
> > the fundamental problems. For distro kernels, I'm less concerned
> > if you hide bugs instead of fixing them.
>
> This is okay as long as you are willing to work around the fundamental
> problems in kernel. You are unable to _fix_ them. They are broken
> BIOSes.
The thing Linux needs to figure out is why Windows doesn't
get confused by what Linux claims to be broken BIOS.
So far I have one live sighting to be addressed by
the upstream kernel (from Knut). I'm certainly looking
forward to the 2nd live sighting...
-Len
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-07 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-02 8:40 2.6.22 regression: thermal trip points Knut Petersen
2007-08-02 8:52 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-02 10:48 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-02 11:00 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-02 12:05 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-02 13:04 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-02 13:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-02 15:57 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-02 18:38 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-02 18:40 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 11:16 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-03 18:59 ` Len Brown
2007-08-06 9:55 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-07 18:58 ` Len Brown [this message]
2007-08-07 21:49 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-13 12:30 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-02 15:55 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-02 9:42 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-02 9:45 ` Adrian Schröter
2007-08-02 9:58 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-02 11:02 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-02 11:13 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-02 11:45 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-02 11:56 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-02 12:42 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-02 12:55 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-02 11:59 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-02 11:57 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-02 12:06 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-02 12:15 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-02 12:35 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-02 12:47 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-02 21:56 ` Len Brown
2007-08-02 21:56 ` Len Brown
2007-08-02 11:32 ` Knut Petersen
2007-08-02 12:06 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-02 13:06 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-02 16:07 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-02 19:25 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-08-02 21:56 ` Len Brown
2007-08-02 21:56 ` Len Brown
2007-08-03 11:43 ` Renato S. Yamane
2007-08-03 18:35 ` Len Brown
2007-08-03 12:53 ` Knut Petersen
2007-08-03 18:30 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708071458.45687.lenb@kernel.org \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=Knut_Petersen@t-online.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.