From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: david@lang.hm, nigel@nigel.suspend2.net,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:14:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070821101404.GA1704@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1187331349.28497.9.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
Hi!
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Ping... is there some next version?
> >
> > I'm stuck at the tools side currently. kexec-1.101 just won't load the
> > kernel properly, and kexec-testing from git does not know -j option. I
> > tried hand-patching it, but got lots of scary rejects.
> >
> > Is there chance for a patch against kexec-testing?
>
> I have some other work to do recently. So the next version will delay
> for some while. :(
Ok, I got it to work -- thanks a lot.
Yes, acpi=off is mandatory. Unfortunately, thinkpad x60 does not boot
with acpi=off (should we add another test to linux firmware kit?
Machines should still boot in acpi=off mode...). acpi=off noapic
nolapic nosmp makes it boot, and that in turn makes kjump work.
Screen is not refreshed on kjump back to original kernel, but I guess
that's to be expected. I did not play with framebuffer, yet.
Maybe it is time to move kjump functionality into -mm and
kexec-testing?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: david@lang.hm, nigel@nigel.suspend2.net,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:14:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070821101404.GA1704@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1187331349.28497.9.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
Hi!
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Ping... is there some next version?
> >
> > I'm stuck at the tools side currently. kexec-1.101 just won't load the
> > kernel properly, and kexec-testing from git does not know -j option. I
> > tried hand-patching it, but got lots of scary rejects.
> >
> > Is there chance for a patch against kexec-testing?
>
> I have some other work to do recently. So the next version will delay
> for some while. :(
Ok, I got it to work -- thanks a lot.
Yes, acpi=off is mandatory. Unfortunately, thinkpad x60 does not boot
with acpi=off (should we add another test to linux firmware kit?
Machines should still boot in acpi=off mode...). acpi=off noapic
nolapic nosmp makes it boot, and that in turn makes kjump work.
Screen is not refreshed on kjump back to original kernel, but I guess
that's to be expected. I did not play with framebuffer, yet.
Maybe it is time to move kjump functionality into -mm and
kexec-testing?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-21 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-15 7:13 [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump Huang, Ying
2007-07-15 7:13 ` Huang, Ying
2007-07-31 9:51 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 9:51 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 9:51 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-01 7:56 ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-01 7:56 ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-05 18:50 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-05 18:50 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-05 18:50 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-16 10:26 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-16 10:26 ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2007-08-16 10:26 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-17 6:15 ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-17 6:15 ` [linux-pm] " Huang, Ying
2007-08-17 6:15 ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-21 10:14 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-21 10:14 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-08-21 10:14 ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2007-08-22 6:51 ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-22 6:51 ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-22 6:51 ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-01 7:56 ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-15 18:44 ` Lombard, David N
2007-08-16 10:24 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070821101404.GA1704@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jbms@cmu.edu \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.