All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:15:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070822181532.GB3362@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80708211341s63f8c1eau922f018e66db49f4@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 05:41:04PM -0300, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:

> Last time I tried a mips build, it would fail the compile unless I was
> using _exactly_ 3.4.4 (I didn't tried older versions, but did try
> 3.4.6, for ex.). So I also think the 3.4 series will still have to be
> around for a while.

I don't know what broken MIPS platform you've tried.  I keep changing
between compiler versions all the time just so I can ensure builds with
older compilers keep working until we officially deciede to drop support
for them.  So the minimum compiler version for 32-bit MIPS kernels is
gcc 3.2 and for 64-bit kernel gcc 3.3.

But for sake of sanity and productivity I definately don't mind dumping
support for gcc < 4.0 or maybe even 4.1.  And while we're at it, let's
deprecate ancient binutils version as well.  A minimum version of 2.17
would be nice as I could get rid of lads of .word sillyness which is
needed to support older binutils.

  Ralf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-22 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-21 13:20 2.6.23-rc3-git3 make warnings Jarek Poplawski
2007-08-21 15:07 ` [Git Patch] ACPI: Fix a warning of discarding qualifiers from pointer target type WANG Cong
2007-08-21 15:14   ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-08-21 15:18     ` Al Viro
2007-08-21 15:22       ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-08-21 15:47         ` Al Viro
2007-08-23  0:59           ` Brown, Len
2007-08-23  0:59             ` Brown, Len
2007-08-23  1:28             ` Al Viro
2007-08-22  7:57       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-08-21 16:17 ` 2.6.23-rc3-git3 make warnings WANG Cong
2007-08-21 16:44   ` Greg KH
2007-08-21 16:57     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-21 16:57     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-21 16:31 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-21 17:35   ` RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Adrian Bunk
2007-08-21 17:54     ` Russell King
2007-08-21 17:54       ` Russell King
2007-08-21 18:14       ` Kyle McMartin
2007-08-21 18:29       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-22  5:48         ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-08-21 18:25     ` Chris Wedgwood
2007-08-21 20:41       ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-08-21 20:56         ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-21 21:01           ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-08-22  6:59         ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2007-08-22 18:15         ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2007-08-21 19:19     ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-21 19:54       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-21 20:07         ` [RFC][PATCH] introduce TASK_SIZE_OF() for all arches Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-21 20:08         ` RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Linus Torvalds
2007-08-21 20:21           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-21 20:32             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-22  7:36               ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-08-21 20:49             ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-21 21:21               ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-21 21:49                 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-21 22:09                   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-22  0:08                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-22  6:07                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-08-21 21:41     ` Oliver Pinter
2007-08-22  7:57       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-22  8:08         ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-08-22  8:10           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-22  8:42             ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-22  8:56             ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-08-22  8:48         ` Martin Michlmayr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070822181532.GB3362@linux-mips.org \
    --to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=glommer@gmail.com \
    --cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.