From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CFS review
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:15:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070825231525.GA334@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708260127.32238.a1426z@gawab.com>
* Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com> wrote:
> > ok. I think i might finally have found the bug causing this. Could
> > you try the fix below, does your webserver thread-startup test work
> > any better?
>
> It seems to help somewhat, but the problem is still visible. Even
> v20.3 on 2.6.22.5 didn't help.
>
> It does look related to ia-boosting, so I turned off __update_curr
> like Roman mentioned, which had an enormous smoothing effect, but then
> nice levels completely break down and lockup the system.
you can turn sleeper-fairness off via:
echo 28 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_features
another thing to try would be:
echo 12 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_features
(that's the new-task penalty turned off.)
Another thing to try would be to edit this:
if (sysctl_sched_features & SCHED_FEAT_START_DEBIT)
p->se.wait_runtime = -(sched_granularity(cfs_rq) / 2);
to:
if (sysctl_sched_features & SCHED_FEAT_START_DEBIT)
p->se.wait_runtime = -(sched_granularity(cfs_rq);
and could you also check 20.4 on 2.6.22.5 perhaps, or very latest -git?
(Peter has experienced smaller spikes with that.)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-25 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-11 10:44 CFS review Al Boldi
2007-08-12 4:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-12 15:27 ` Al Boldi
2007-08-12 15:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-12 19:43 ` Al Boldi
2007-08-21 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-21 22:27 ` Al Boldi
2007-08-24 13:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-25 22:27 ` Al Boldi
2007-08-25 23:15 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-08-26 16:27 ` Al Boldi
2007-08-26 16:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-27 4:06 ` Al Boldi
2007-08-27 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-27 14:46 ` Al Boldi
2007-08-27 20:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-28 4:37 ` Al Boldi
2007-08-28 5:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-28 5:23 ` Al Boldi
2007-08-28 7:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-08-28 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-28 16:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-28 16:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-28 16:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-29 4:19 ` Al Boldi
2007-08-29 4:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-29 5:58 ` Al Boldi
2007-08-29 6:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-28 20:46 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-08-28 7:43 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-08-28 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-28 19:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-28 19:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-29 4:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-29 4:29 ` Keith Packard
2007-08-29 4:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-29 7:57 ` Keith Packard
2007-08-29 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-29 8:53 ` Al Boldi
2007-08-29 15:57 ` Keith Packard
2007-08-29 19:56 ` Rene Herman
2007-08-30 7:05 ` Rene Herman
2007-08-30 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-31 6:46 ` Tilman Sauerbeck
2007-08-31 10:44 ` DRM and/or X trouble (was Re: CFS review) Rene Herman
2007-08-31 14:55 ` DRM and/or X trouble Satyam Sharma
2007-08-30 16:06 ` CFS review Chuck Ebbert
2007-08-30 16:48 ` Rene Herman
2007-08-29 4:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-08-29 3:42 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-08-29 3:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-08-29 3:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-29 13:11 ` Bill Davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-10 8:31 -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 Andrew Morton
2007-07-11 12:43 ` x86 status was " Andi Kleen
2007-07-11 17:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-11 21:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-11 21:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-07-11 22:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-13 2:23 ` Roman Zippel
2007-07-13 4:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-13 17:23 ` Roman Zippel
2007-07-14 5:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-08-01 3:41 ` CFS review Roman Zippel
2007-08-01 7:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-01 7:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-08-01 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-01 7:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-08-01 8:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-08-01 13:19 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-01 15:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-01 17:10 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-01 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-01 17:48 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-01 17:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-01 18:01 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-01 19:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-09 23:14 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-10 5:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-10 13:52 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-10 14:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-10 16:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-08-10 17:19 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-10 16:54 ` Michael Chang
2007-08-10 17:25 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-10 19:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-10 19:47 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-10 21:15 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-10 21:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-10 22:50 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-11 5:28 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-12 5:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-11 0:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-20 22:19 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-21 7:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-08-21 8:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-21 11:54 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-11 5:15 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-10 7:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-08-01 11:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-01 12:21 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-01 12:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-01 13:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-01 14:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-01 15:44 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-01 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-01 18:14 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-03 3:04 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-03 3:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-03 4:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-03 4:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-03 4:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-03 4:38 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-03 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-03 9:29 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-01 11:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-01 12:27 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-01 13:20 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-01 13:33 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-01 14:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-01 16:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-02 2:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-02 4:57 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-02 10:43 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-02 10:07 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-02 16:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-02 22:38 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-02 19:16 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-02 23:23 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-01 14:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-01 14:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-02 17:36 ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-02 15:46 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070825231525.GA334@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.