From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rth@twiddle.net,
hskinnemoen@atmel.com, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
dev-etrax@axis.com, dhowells@redhat.com, discuss@x86-64.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
chris@zankel.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] forbid asm/bitops.h direct inclusion
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:03:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070910130352.GF3563@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070910122838.GA10143@linux-mips.org>
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:28:38PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 09:00:48PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
> > forbid asm/bitops.h direct inclusion
> >
> > Because of compile errors that may occur after bit changes if asm/bitops.h is
> > included directly without e.g. linux/kernel.h which includes linux/bitops.h, forbid
> > direct inclusion of asm/bitops.h. Thanks to Adrian Bunk.
>
> This is the kind of thing that checkpatch.pl is already checking for and
> I like that idea much more than adding thousands of checks over many of
> the header files under asm.
Checks in the header are only for header files where including only the
asm header doesn't work which doesn't seem to be the common case.
> Ralf
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rth@twiddle.net,
hskinnemoen@atmel.com, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
dev-etrax@axis.com, dhowells@redhat.com, discuss@x86-64.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
chris@zankel.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] forbid asm/bitops.h direct inclusion
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:03:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070910130352.GF3563@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070910122838.GA10143@linux-mips.org>
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:28:38PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 09:00:48PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
> > forbid asm/bitops.h direct inclusion
> >
> > Because of compile errors that may occur after bit changes if asm/bitops.h is
> > included directly without e.g. linux/kernel.h which includes linux/bitops.h, forbid
> > direct inclusion of asm/bitops.h. Thanks to Adrian Bunk.
>
> This is the kind of thing that checkpatch.pl is already checking for and
> I like that idea much more than adding thousands of checks over many of
> the header files under asm.
Checks in the header are only for header files where including only the
asm header doesn't work which doesn't seem to be the common case.
> Ralf
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-10 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-08 19:59 [PATCH 1/2] remove asm/bitops.h includes Jiri Slaby
2007-09-08 20:00 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-09-08 20:00 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-09-08 19:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] forbid asm/bitops.h direct inclusion Jiri Slaby
2007-09-08 20:06 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-09-08 20:00 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-09-08 20:00 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-09-10 12:28 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-09-10 12:28 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-09-10 13:03 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-09-10 13:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-09 8:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] remove asm/bitops.h includes Andi Kleen
2007-09-09 14:12 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-09-09 14:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-10 12:30 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070910130352.GF3563@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=dev-etrax@axis.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.