From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/7] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent Code
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:47:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070918204718.GB12994@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200709182101.12284.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
* Denys Vlasenko (vda.linux@googlemail.com) wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 September 2007 18:59, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Denys Vlasenko (vda.linux@googlemail.com) wrote:
> > > On Monday 17 September 2007 19:42, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > > Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h 2007-09-17 13:25:06.000000000 -0400
> > > > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h 2007-09-17 13:35:50.000000000 -0400
> > > > @@ -122,6 +122,13 @@
> > > > VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__stop___kcrctab_gpl_future) = .; \
> > > > } \
> > > > \
> > > > + /* Immediate values: pointers */ \
> > > > + __immediate : AT(ADDR(__immediate) - LOAD_OFFSET) { \
> > > > + VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__start___immediate) = .; \
> > > > + *(__immediate) \
> > > > + VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__stop___immediate) = .; \
> > > > + } \
> > > > + \
> > >
> > > Why do you need an output section for that? IOW: will this work too?
> > >
> > > .data : ... {
> > > ...
> > >
> > > VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__start___immediate) = .; \
> > > *(__immediate) \
> > > VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__stop___immediate) = .; \
> > > ...
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > This last one could cause alignment problems. We either have to use the
> > proper ALIGN() before the section, or let AT(ADDR(__immediate) -
> > LOAD_OFFSET) take care of it. I prefer the latter.
>
> This adds yet another output section in vmlinux, and there is
> no tools which need that. We already have 30+ sections there while we need ~20.
>
> I am trying to fix the mess. Please don't add to it.
>
> Re alignment: (1) do you really realy REALLY need it? Last I checked,
> i386 was handling unaligned accesses just fine; and
> (2) this works:
>
> . = ALIGN(4)
> VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__start___immediate) = .; \
> *(__immediate) \
> VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__stop___immediate) = .; \
>
>
Alignment: I need the __start___immediate and __stop___immediate values
to be at the same alignment as the *(__immediate) content, or else we
end up thinking that padding is data.
. = ALIGN(4) works fine as long as the structure within the section is
not bigger or equal to 32 bytes: gcc has the habit to align 32 bytes
structure on 32 bytes multiples. The safest way I found to do it is to
declare the section as I do: it will cause no breakage if anybody append
data to the structure.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-18 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-17 18:42 [patch 0/7] Immediate Values Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-17 18:42 ` [patch 1/7] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent Code Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 17:47 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-18 17:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 20:01 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-18 20:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2007-09-19 8:45 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-19 8:57 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-19 11:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-17 18:42 ` [patch 2/7] Immediate Values - Kconfig menu in EMBEDDED Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-17 20:55 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-17 18:42 ` [patch 3/7] Immediate Values - Move Kprobes i386 restore_interrupt to kdebug.h Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-17 18:42 ` [patch 4/7] Immediate Values - i386 Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 6:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2007-09-17 18:42 ` [patch 5/7] Immediate Values - Powerpc Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-17 18:42 ` [patch 6/7] Immediate Values - Documentation Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-17 20:55 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-18 13:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-17 18:42 ` [patch 7/7] Scheduler Profiling - Use Immediate Values Mathieu Desnoyers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-18 21:07 [patch 0/7] Immediate Values for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-18 21:07 ` [patch 1/7] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent Code Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-06 2:07 [patch 0/7] Immediate Values (redux) for 2.6.24-rc4-git3 Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-06 2:07 ` [patch 1/7] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent Code Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-02 21:08 [patch 0/7] Immediate Values Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-02 21:08 ` [patch 1/7] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent Code Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-26 22:52 ` Jason Baron
2008-02-26 23:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-26 23:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-27 16:44 ` Jason Baron
2008-02-27 17:01 ` Jason Baron
2008-02-27 19:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-28 16:50 ` Jason Baron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070918204718.GB12994@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.