From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linville@tuxdriver.com, jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please pull 'rt2x00' branch of wireless-2.6
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:58:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709192058.29323.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200709192036.59443.mb@bu3sch.de>
On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 September 2007 20:47:59 Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 September 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:31:19 +0200
> > >
> > > > Because I am indeed not really happy with this early merge, but I'll do my
> > > > best to resolve the last outstanding bugs as soon as possible.
> > >
> > > Relax :-)
> >
> > :)
> >
> > > A merge upstream doesn't mean "bug free", it means "significantly
> > > better than no driver at all" and that is undoubtedly the case
> > > here.
> >
> > Well I am happy rt2x00 is being considered good enough for upstream already,
> > but I have the habbit of wanting things bug-free before pushing it further upstream.
> >
> > Well most users are happy with current rt2x00 version anyway,
> > so the remaining issues probably aren't that big anyway. (Except for the 2 panics,
> > which should be resolved soon anyway) ;)
>
> Well, you have nothing to lose, basically.
> It's impossible for you to create a regression.
> So everything is fine, even if it's buggy and doesn't
> work at all. ;)
Hehe. Thanks. I'll keep that in mind. ;)
Ivo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Michael Buesch <mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org,
jeff-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Please pull 'rt2x00' branch of wireless-2.6
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:58:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709192058.29323.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200709192036.59443.mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 September 2007 20:47:59 Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 September 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:31:19 +0200
> > >
> > > > Because I am indeed not really happy with this early merge, but I'll do my
> > > > best to resolve the last outstanding bugs as soon as possible.
> > >
> > > Relax :-)
> >
> > :)
> >
> > > A merge upstream doesn't mean "bug free", it means "significantly
> > > better than no driver at all" and that is undoubtedly the case
> > > here.
> >
> > Well I am happy rt2x00 is being considered good enough for upstream already,
> > but I have the habbit of wanting things bug-free before pushing it further upstream.
> >
> > Well most users are happy with current rt2x00 version anyway,
> > so the remaining issues probably aren't that big anyway. (Except for the 2 panics,
> > which should be resolved soon anyway) ;)
>
> Well, you have nothing to lose, basically.
> It's impossible for you to create a regression.
> So everything is fine, even if it's buggy and doesn't
> work at all. ;)
Hehe. Thanks. I'll keep that in mind. ;)
Ivo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-19 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-18 21:32 Please pull 'rt2x00' branch of wireless-2.6 John W. Linville
2007-09-18 21:32 ` John W. Linville
2007-09-18 22:32 ` David Miller
2007-09-18 22:32 ` David Miller
2007-09-19 18:31 ` Ivo van Doorn
2007-09-19 18:31 ` Ivo van Doorn
2007-09-19 18:21 ` David Miller
2007-09-19 18:47 ` Ivo van Doorn
2007-09-19 18:36 ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-19 18:36 ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-19 18:58 ` Ivo van Doorn [this message]
2007-09-19 18:58 ` Ivo van Doorn
2007-09-19 19:11 ` John W. Linville
2007-09-19 20:59 ` Ivo van Doorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200709192058.29323.IvDoorn@gmail.com \
--to=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.