* cpuidle
@ 2007-09-24 0:57 Andrew Morton
2007-09-24 2:28 ` cpuidle Len Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2007-09-24 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Len Brown; +Cc: linux-acpi, Thomas Gleixner
Whaaaaa? Seems that the cpuidle patches all got dropped, but the x86_64
dynticks patches were fairly heavily dependent upon them. (iow: I'm
screwed).
I can go back to the old version of git-acpi and retain the dynticks
patches or I can drop the dynticks patches. (Either way I remain screwed).
What's happening?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: cpuidle
2007-09-24 0:57 cpuidle Andrew Morton
@ 2007-09-24 2:28 ` Len Brown
2007-09-24 2:39 ` cpuidle Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2007-09-24 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-acpi, Thomas Gleixner, Pallipadi, Venki
On Sunday 23 September 2007 20:57, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Whaaaaa? Seems that the cpuidle patches all got dropped, but the x86_64
> dynticks patches were fairly heavily dependent upon them. (iow: I'm
> screwed).
>
> I can go back to the old version of git-acpi and retain the dynticks
> patches or I can drop the dynticks patches. (Either way I remain screwed).
>
> What's happening?
Yes, I dropped cpuidle on Friday with plans to re-merge it Monday.
The reason is because I re-wrote my test tree Friday in prep for 2.6.24.
As cpuidle had been merged multiple times, I needed to re-merge it and
deal with the conflicts, and I ran out of time.
What we should end up with on Monday is a single cpuidle patch
that sits on top of 2.6.22, and a single patch that merges it up to 2.6.23.
sorry for the disruption,
-Len
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: cpuidle
2007-09-24 2:28 ` cpuidle Len Brown
@ 2007-09-24 2:39 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-24 3:12 ` cpuidle Len Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2007-09-24 2:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Len Brown; +Cc: linux-acpi, Thomas Gleixner, Pallipadi, Venki
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:28:30 -0400 Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sunday 23 September 2007 20:57, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Whaaaaa? Seems that the cpuidle patches all got dropped, but the x86_64
> > dynticks patches were fairly heavily dependent upon them. (iow: I'm
> > screwed).
> >
> > I can go back to the old version of git-acpi and retain the dynticks
> > patches or I can drop the dynticks patches. (Either way I remain screwed).
> >
> > What's happening?
>
> Yes, I dropped cpuidle on Friday with plans to re-merge it Monday.
>
> The reason is because I re-wrote my test tree Friday in prep for 2.6.24.
> As cpuidle had been merged multiple times, I needed to re-merge it and
> deal with the conflicts, and I ran out of time.
>
> What we should end up with on Monday is a single cpuidle patch
> that sits on top of 2.6.22, and a single patch that merges it up to 2.6.23.
>
I really don't know what I did, but for some reason the patches all
applied after I fiddled with something. Maybe I broke something, dunno.
I did drop a few acpi patches which were dependent upon cpuidle:
-acpi-suspend-consolidate-handling-of-sx-states.patch
-acpi-suspend-consolidate-handling-of-sx-states-addendum.patch
but they were staged _after_ the dynticks patches so I dunno what's going
on. I guess when I try to compile this lot I'll have a better idea...
ho hum. I hope I haven't lost any patches during this little episode.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: cpuidle
2007-09-24 2:39 ` cpuidle Andrew Morton
@ 2007-09-24 3:12 ` Len Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2007-09-24 3:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-acpi, Thomas Gleixner, Pallipadi, Venki
> -acpi-suspend-consolidate-handling-of-sx-states.patch
> -acpi-suspend-consolidate-handling-of-sx-states-addendum.patch
Those two went to Linus Saturday morning.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-24 3:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-24 0:57 cpuidle Andrew Morton
2007-09-24 2:28 ` cpuidle Len Brown
2007-09-24 2:39 ` cpuidle Andrew Morton
2007-09-24 3:12 ` cpuidle Len Brown
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.