From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: David Newall <david@davidnewall.com>,
Christer Weinigel <christer@weinigel.se>,
Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
majkls <majkls@prepere.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:59:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070927035925.GT8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070927000137.GV6800@stusta.de>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:01:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> <-- snip -->
>
> Look, when chroot was being designed, I think they intended that even root
> should be unable to get out. They went so far as to say that dot-dot
> wouldn't let you out; and it doesn't.
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> You were clearly saying that whom you call "they" were the people who
> designed chroot. And it was you who was claiming in this statement that
> "they" said it.
>
> The OpenBSD manpage you quoted in this thread states chroot() was added
> in 4.2BSD, and 4.2BSD was released in 1983.
>
> You should therefore either bring a source where the people who designed
> chroot() in 1983 or earlier are stating what you claim they said or
> admit that you were talking utter bullshit.
chroot() is present in v7, thank you very much. /usr/sys/sys/sys4.c has
chdir()
{
chdirec(&u.u_cdir);
}
chroot()
{
if (suser())
chdirec(&u.u_rdir);
}
and back then it didn't stop lookups by .. at all - u_rdir is only used
in the beginning of namei() (when pathname starts with /), plus the obvious
refcounting in exit()/newproc(). So give me a break - back when it had
been introduced, it didn't do anything jail-like _at_ _all_.
That check appears only in BSD:
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* vfs_lookup.c 4.4 03/06/81 */
+/* vfs_lookup.c 4.5 81/03/09 */
#include "../h/param.h"
#include "../h/systm.h"
@@ -107,6 +107,9 @@
u.u_segflg = 1;
eo = 0;
bp = NULL;
+ if (dp == u.u_rdir && u.u_dent.d_name[0] == '.' &&
+ u.u_dent.d_name[1] == '.' && u.u_dent.d_name[2] == 0)
+ goto cloop;
eloop:
with spectaculary lousy commit message ("lint and a minor fixed") by
wnj. Feel free to ask Bill Joy WTF he had intended. At a guess,
more consistent behaviour in chrooted environment (i.e. pathname
resolution looking as if the subtree had been everything).
To talk about root-safety of _anything_ at that point is bloody ridiculous.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-27 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-19 7:19 sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix majkls
2007-09-19 9:40 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-19 18:27 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-19 18:45 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-19 22:24 ` David Newall
2007-09-21 17:39 ` Phillip Susi
2007-09-21 18:10 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-25 20:53 ` Phillip Susi
2007-09-26 0:23 ` Al Viro
2007-09-26 10:34 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 11:21 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-26 11:22 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 11:38 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-26 11:56 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 14:10 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-26 15:03 ` Chris Adams
2007-09-26 16:54 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 17:04 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-26 17:18 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 17:29 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-26 17:28 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 18:40 ` Al Viro
2007-09-26 19:24 ` Christer Weinigel
2007-09-26 21:19 ` David Newall
2007-09-26 21:55 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-26 23:35 ` David Newall
2007-09-27 0:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-27 3:59 ` Al Viro [this message]
2007-09-27 6:42 ` David Newall
2007-09-27 6:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-27 7:28 ` Christer Weinigel
2007-09-27 11:23 ` Theodore Tso
2007-09-27 14:36 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-28 1:06 ` David Newall
[not found] <952DN-83o-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <954cl-29C-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <95ctn-74b-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <95cMH-7um-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <95gdA-4OZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-09-20 11:13 ` Bodo Eggert
2007-09-20 11:59 ` Philipp Marek
2007-09-20 12:52 ` majkls
2007-09-20 16:06 ` David Newall
2007-09-20 16:17 ` Philipp Marek
2007-09-20 18:02 ` David Newall
2007-09-20 20:53 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-21 8:29 ` David Newall
2007-09-24 21:32 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-09-24 22:04 ` David Newall
2007-09-24 23:00 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-09-25 7:45 ` David Newall
2007-09-25 11:49 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-09-25 13:58 ` David Newall
2007-09-24 23:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <95UE2-1oR-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <95V72-2ly-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <97pG8-3B5-47@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <97sX2-p1-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-09-26 9:38 ` Nick Craig-Wood
[not found] <fa.1U6+49SWHSlhuK5/3PBckFWAbXU@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.WASh5K8oOF4DAq3sSYtIlWNCdWQ@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.X6MeYG+PmN8/e5zfGij80quLaws@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa./eIdqiAY0Mx9xHl6ESobHaLKJBM@ifi.uio.no>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070927035925.GT8181@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=christer@weinigel.se \
--cc=david@davidnewall.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=majkls@prepere.com \
--cc=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.