Re: [PATCH 5/6] Filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask

[Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>]

Mel replied to Lee:
> > > +	return nodes_intersect(nodemask, current->mems_allowed);
> >                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- should be nodes_intersects, I think.
> 
> Crap, you're right, I missed the warning about implicit declarations. I
> apologise. This is the corrected version

I found myself making that same error, saying 'nodes_intersect' instead
of 'nodes_intersects' the other day.  And I might be the one who invented
that name ;).

This would probably be too noisey and too little gain to do on the
Linux kernel, but if this was just a little private project of my own,
I'd be running a script over the whole thing, modifying all 30 or so
instances of bitmap_intersects, cpus_intersects and nodes_intersects so
as to remove the final 's' character.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401