From: "Denys" <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:52:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071001114715.M51349@nuclearcat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071001111441.GA17357@one.firstfloor.org>
Hi
No major differences.
Some procedures higher a bit, some lower a bit, but everything looks fine on
both kernels.
Thats what i tried first - oprofile, and only one keypoint i was able to catch
- in top softirqd/0 or /1 shows usage 100% cpu, and in mpstat - soft% also
reaching 100%.
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:14:41 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:30:52PM +0300, Denys wrote:
> >
> > Already i did, and it didn't show real failure point.
>
> There was no difference between the profile of the working kernel
> and the high load kernel? Perhaps you just have legitimate higher load?
>
> -Andi
--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-01 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-30 14:48 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression Denys
2007-09-30 17:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-09-30 4:25 ` Nick Piggin
2007-09-30 22:04 ` Denys
2007-10-01 10:01 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-01 10:30 ` Denys
2007-10-01 11:14 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-01 11:52 ` Denys [this message]
2007-10-01 11:57 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-01 12:04 ` Denys
2007-09-30 22:35 ` Denys
2007-10-01 5:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-01 7:12 ` David Miller
2007-10-01 8:07 ` Denys
2007-10-01 8:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-01 8:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-01 12:10 ` Denys
2007-10-01 13:26 ` Denys
2007-10-01 20:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-01 20:57 ` David Miller
2007-09-30 23:24 ` Denys
2007-10-01 6:43 ` Denys
2007-09-30 18:45 ` Denys
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-30 15:22 Denys
2007-09-30 17:31 Denys
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071001114715.M51349@nuclearcat.com \
--to=nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.