From: Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@de.ibm.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Thomas Klein <tklein@de.ibm.com>,
Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@de.ibm.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@de.ibm.com>,
Marcus Eder <meder@de.ibm.com>,
Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ehea: DLPAR memory add fix
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:54:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710011654.14067.ossthema@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <470107D9.2040301@garzik.org>
Hi,
On Monday 01 October 2007 16:44, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > Due to stability issues in high load situations the HW queue handling
> > has to be changed. The HW queues are now stopped and restarted again instead
> > of destroying and allocating new HW queues.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@de.ibm.com>
>
> May I presume this is for 2.6.23?
>
> Jeff
no, the patch is build against 2.6.24 upstream (new NAPI interface).
Regards,
Jan-Bernd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@de.ibm.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@de.ibm.com>,
Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Marcus Eder <meder@de.ibm.com>, Thomas Klein <tklein@de.ibm.com>,
Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ehea: DLPAR memory add fix
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:54:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710011654.14067.ossthema@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <470107D9.2040301@garzik.org>
Hi,
On Monday 01 October 2007 16:44, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > Due to stability issues in high load situations the HW queue handling
> > has to be changed. The HW queues are now stopped and restarted again instead
> > of destroying and allocating new HW queues.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@de.ibm.com>
>
> May I presume this is for 2.6.23?
>
> Jeff
no, the patch is build against 2.6.24 upstream (new NAPI interface).
Regards,
Jan-Bernd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-01 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-01 14:33 [PATCH] ehea: DLPAR memory add fix Jan-Bernd Themann
2007-10-01 14:33 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2007-10-01 14:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-01 14:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-01 14:54 ` Jan-Bernd Themann [this message]
2007-10-01 14:54 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2007-10-01 15:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-01 15:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-02 17:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-02 17:31 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200710011654.14067.ossthema@de.ibm.com \
--to=ossthema@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=meder@de.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raisch@de.ibm.com \
--cc=stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com \
--cc=themann@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tklein@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.