From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, randy.dunlap@oracle.com,
menage@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dino@in.ibm.com,
cpw@sgi.com, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag fixes
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:39:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071005163918.46d40fed.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071005161305.af27f452.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew wrote:
> I'm getting 100% rejects from this - probably whatever patch it is
> patching got lost or unrecognisably mangled.
Yup - so far as I can tell, you didn't pick up the base patch that
this current patch fixes. So, no, I wouldn't expect this patch to
make any sense.
As I stated in this current patch in the diffstat section after the
'---' marker, this current patch applies to the base patch of Subject:
[PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag
You probably didn't pick up that base patch because Nick and I are
still haggling over it. Well ... we've agreed, but I can't get the
scheduler to work as I thought Nick wanted, and I'm still waiting
to hear from Nick again.
==> So yeah - throw this current patch out.
Nick ... you there ?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-05 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-03 11:44 [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag fixes Paul Jackson
2007-10-05 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-05 23:39 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2007-10-06 5:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-06 6:01 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-06 6:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-06 6:28 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071005163918.46d40fed.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.