* 3.1.1 RC4?
@ 2007-10-08 19:13 Ben Guthro
2007-10-09 7:59 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ben Guthro @ 2007-10-08 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Keir,
I noticed that a Shadow patch went into the 3.1.1 staging tree today.
Does this mean that we should expect a 4th release candidate before the
3.1.1 release tag is official?
If so - how much testing time are you going to give that release
candidate before deciding whether a release tag, or another RC round is
appropriate?
Ben Guthro
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.1.1 RC4?
2007-10-08 19:13 3.1.1 RC4? Ben Guthro
@ 2007-10-09 7:59 ` Keir Fraser
2007-10-09 8:03 ` Christoph Egger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2007-10-09 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Guthro, xen-devel
On 8/10/07 20:13, "Ben Guthro" <bguthro@virtualiron.com> wrote:
> I noticed that a Shadow patch went into the 3.1.1 staging tree today.
> Does this mean that we should expect a 4th release candidate before the
> 3.1.1 release tag is official?
>
> If so - how much testing time are you going to give that release
> candidate before deciding whether a release tag, or another RC round is
> appropriate?
Actually I don't plan to do another -rc round just for that one. It's an
obvious bug fix.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.1.1 RC4?
2007-10-09 7:59 ` Keir Fraser
@ 2007-10-09 8:03 ` Christoph Egger
2007-10-09 8:17 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Egger @ 2007-10-09 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Ben Guthro
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 09:59:14 Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 8/10/07 20:13, "Ben Guthro" <bguthro@virtualiron.com> wrote:
> > I noticed that a Shadow patch went into the 3.1.1 staging tree today.
> > Does this mean that we should expect a 4th release candidate before the
> > 3.1.1 release tag is official?
> >
> > If so - how much testing time are you going to give that release
> > candidate before deciding whether a release tag, or another RC round is
> > appropriate?
>
> Actually I don't plan to do another -rc round just for that one. It's an
> obvious bug fix.
Maybe you will or have to for security reasons:
http://secunia.com/advisories/26986/
1) has been fixed, 2) 3) and 4) are qemu related and impact
Xen through ioemu in the tools.
Christoph
--
AMD Saxony, Dresden, Germany
Operating System Research Center
Legal Information:
AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Sitz (Geschäftsanschrift):
Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Deutschland
Registergericht Dresden: HRA 4896
vertretungsberechtigter Komplementär:
AMD Saxony LLC (Sitz Wilmington, Delaware, USA)
Geschäftsführer der AMD Saxony LLC:
Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.1.1 RC4?
2007-10-09 8:03 ` Christoph Egger
@ 2007-10-09 8:17 ` Keir Fraser
2007-10-09 8:31 ` Christoph Egger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2007-10-09 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Egger, xen-devel; +Cc: Ben Guthro
On 9/10/07 09:03, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> wrote:
> Maybe you will or have to for security reasons:
> http://secunia.com/advisories/26986/
>
> 1) has been fixed, 2) 3) and 4) are qemu related and impact
> Xen through ioemu in the tools.
2) is fixed by 14914. 3) and 4) are fixed by 15447. Both changesets are in
-rc3.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.1.1 RC4?
2007-10-09 8:17 ` Keir Fraser
@ 2007-10-09 8:31 ` Christoph Egger
2007-10-09 9:00 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Egger @ 2007-10-09 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Ben Guthro
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 10:17:19 Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 9/10/07 09:03, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> wrote:
> > Maybe you will or have to for security reasons:
> > http://secunia.com/advisories/26986/
> >
> > 1) has been fixed, 2) 3) and 4) are qemu related and impact
> > Xen through ioemu in the tools.
>
> 2) is fixed by 14914. 3) and 4) are fixed by 15447. Both changesets are in
> -rc3.
Ah, good to know. Thanks for the information. Now we only need the
final Xen 3.1.1 release to actually happen :)
Christoph
--
AMD Saxony, Dresden, Germany
Operating System Research Center
Legal Information:
AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Sitz (Geschäftsanschrift):
Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Deutschland
Registergericht Dresden: HRA 4896
vertretungsberechtigter Komplementär:
AMD Saxony LLC (Sitz Wilmington, Delaware, USA)
Geschäftsführer der AMD Saxony LLC:
Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.1.1 RC4?
2007-10-09 8:31 ` Christoph Egger
@ 2007-10-09 9:00 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2007-10-09 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Egger, xen-devel; +Cc: Ben Guthro
On 9/10/07 09:31, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> wrote:
>> 2) is fixed by 14914. 3) and 4) are fixed by 15447. Both changesets are in
>> -rc3.
>
> Ah, good to know. Thanks for the information. Now we only need the
> final Xen 3.1.1 release to actually happen :)
That'll be this week, assuming no deluge of patches triggering another -rc
round. And it'll be source-only, at least in the first instance until we
find time to build, test and publish binary packages.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-09 9:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-08 19:13 3.1.1 RC4? Ben Guthro
2007-10-09 7:59 ` Keir Fraser
2007-10-09 8:03 ` Christoph Egger
2007-10-09 8:17 ` Keir Fraser
2007-10-09 8:31 ` Christoph Egger
2007-10-09 9:00 ` Keir Fraser
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.