From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] i2c: Fix NACK detection in i2c-pasemi
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:59:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071024155917.GA25312@lixom.net> (raw)
i2c: Fix NACK detection in i2c-pasemi
Turns out we don't actually check the status to see if there was a
device out there to talk to, just if we had a timeout when doing so.
Add the proper check, so we don't falsly think there are devices
on the bus that are not there, etc.
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
---
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:51:09PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> The question is, how do you manage to get that many errors reported,
> when I don't get any when loading the lm90 driver, despite the 6 I2C
> buses on my system. When you reach this point in the lm90 driver, it
> means that i2c-core successfully probed that there was a device at said
> address on the given bus. I have a hard time believing that you have
> chips at 0x18, 0x19, 0x1a, 0x29, 0x2a, 0x2b, 0x4c, 0x4d and 0x4e on 3
> different I2C buses on your system.
>
> It sounds like the underlying bus driver is broken and report chips
> where they aren't. What are these I2C buses? Their driver(s) needs
> fixing.
Crap, yeah, you're right. This was the only driver behaving this way
for me, and I didn't have another controller to test on.
The bug is indeed in our bus driver, we don't check for NACK's, only
timeouts (I was of the impresison that a nack would cause a timeout,
but that's obviously wrong).
Patch below. Thanks a bunch!
-Olof
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi.c
index 58e3271..a1d339e 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct pasemi_smbus {
#define MRXFIFO_DATA_M 0x000000ff
#define SMSTA_XEN 0x08000000
+#define SMSTA_MTN 0x00200000
#define CTL_MRR 0x00000400
#define CTL_MTR 0x00000200
@@ -98,6 +99,10 @@ static unsigned int pasemi_smb_waitready(struct pasemi_smbus *smbus)
status = reg_read(smbus, REG_SMSTA);
}
+ /* Got NACK? */
+ if (status & SMSTA_MTN)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
if (timeout < 0) {
dev_warn(&smbus->dev->dev, "Timeout, status 0x%08x\n", status);
reg_write(smbus, REG_SMSTA, status);
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next reply other threads:[~2007-10-24 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-24 15:59 Olof Johansson [this message]
2007-10-24 21:39 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] i2c: Fix NACK detection in i2c-pasemi Jean Delvare
2007-10-24 22:13 ` Olof Johansson
2007-10-25 13:27 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071024155917.GA25312@lixom.net \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.