From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: trenn@suse.de, linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Detect hwmon and i2c bus drivers interfering with ACPI Operation Region resources
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:51:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071025155135.019baca3@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071024205723.458fab97.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:57:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:31:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > it seems Len's test tree and Linus tree diverged a bit, at least with
> > this patch set things do not apply cleanly.
> >
> > Therefore I post these for discussion whether and in which kernel tree
> > they should end up before doing work for nothing.
> > If they are still a candidate for 2.6.24 (rather unintrusive), pls tell
> > me whether and when I should base them against Len's test/release branch
> > or whatever other tree.
> > If not, it would be great if they can be included into the -mm tree and
> > I can rebase them against this one.
>
> I staged the three acpi patches against Len's tree and I staged the hwmon
> patch against Mark's tree and I staged the I2C patch against Jean's tree.
>
> This means that if/when the ACPI patches have gone me->Len->Linus, I can
> send the I2C patch to Jean and the hwmon patch to Mark and we're all good.
Thanks for picking these patches, having them in -mm for some time is
exactly what we need. Let's see how many systems are affected by the
resource conflicts and how we can fix them
--
Jean Delvare
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: trenn@suse.de, linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Detect hwmon and i2c bus drivers interfering with ACPI Operation Region resources
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:51:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071025155135.019baca3@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071024205723.458fab97.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:57:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:31:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > it seems Len's test tree and Linus tree diverged a bit, at least with
> > this patch set things do not apply cleanly.
> >
> > Therefore I post these for discussion whether and in which kernel tree
> > they should end up before doing work for nothing.
> > If they are still a candidate for 2.6.24 (rather unintrusive), pls tell
> > me whether and when I should base them against Len's test/release branch
> > or whatever other tree.
> > If not, it would be great if they can be included into the -mm tree and
> > I can rebase them against this one.
>
> I staged the three acpi patches against Len's tree and I staged the hwmon
> patch against Mark's tree and I staged the I2C patch against Jean's tree.
>
> This means that if/when the ACPI patches have gone me->Len->Linus, I can
> send the I2C patch to Jean and the hwmon patch to Mark and we're all good.
Thanks for picking these patches, having them in -mm for some time is
exactly what we need. Let's see how many systems are affected by the
resource conflicts and how we can fix them
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-25 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-24 14:31 [PATCH 0/5] Detect hwmon and i2c bus drivers interfering with ACPI Operation Region resources Thomas Renninger
2007-10-25 3:57 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-25 13:51 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2007-10-25 13:51 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-25 20:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-25 20:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-26 19:23 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-26 19:23 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-25 12:04 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2007-10-25 15:54 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-25 15:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-10-25 22:55 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-10-26 3:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-10-26 10:45 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-10-26 13:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-10-26 20:39 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-27 15:09 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-10-29 2:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-10-29 13:11 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-10-30 18:43 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-25 21:36 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071025155135.019baca3@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.