From: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: jeff@garzik.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] e1000e: Fix jumbo frame receive code.
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:57:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071025205744.32645.59503.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Fix allocation and freeing of jumbo frames where several bugs
were recently introduced by cleanups after we forked this code
from e1000. This moves ps_pages to buffer_info where it really
belongs and makes it a dynamically allocated array. The penalty
is not that high since it's allocated outside of the buffer_info
struct anyway.
Without this patch all jumbo frames are completely broken and the
driver panics.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h | 4 +-
drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h b/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h
index d2499bb..811eada 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h
@@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ struct e1000_buffer {
};
/* RX */
struct page *page;
+ /* arrays of page information for packet split */
+ struct e1000_ps_page *ps_pages;
};
};
@@ -142,8 +144,6 @@ struct e1000_ring {
/* array of buffer information structs */
struct e1000_buffer *buffer_info;
- /* arrays of page information for packet split */
- struct e1000_ps_page *ps_pages;
struct sk_buff *rx_skb_top;
struct e1000_queue_stats stats;
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
index 033e124..46c5ac6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -245,37 +245,36 @@ static void e1000_alloc_rx_buffers_ps(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
rx_desc = E1000_RX_DESC_PS(*rx_ring, i);
for (j = 0; j < PS_PAGE_BUFFERS; j++) {
- ps_page = &rx_ring->ps_pages[(i * PS_PAGE_BUFFERS)
- + j];
- if (j < adapter->rx_ps_pages) {
+ ps_page = &buffer_info->ps_pages[j];
+ if (j >= adapter->rx_ps_pages) {
+ /* all unused desc entries get hw null ptr */
+ rx_desc->read.buffer_addr[j+1] = ~0;
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (!ps_page->page) {
+ ps_page->page = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!ps_page->page) {
- ps_page->page = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!ps_page->page) {
- adapter->alloc_rx_buff_failed++;
- goto no_buffers;
- }
- ps_page->dma = pci_map_page(pdev,
- ps_page->page,
- 0, PAGE_SIZE,
- PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
- if (pci_dma_mapping_error(
- ps_page->dma)) {
- dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev,
- "RX DMA page map failed\n");
- adapter->rx_dma_failed++;
- goto no_buffers;
- }
+ adapter->alloc_rx_buff_failed++;
+ goto no_buffers;
+ }
+ ps_page->dma = pci_map_page(pdev,
+ ps_page->page,
+ 0, PAGE_SIZE,
+ PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
+ if (pci_dma_mapping_error(ps_page->dma)) {
+ dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev,
+ "RX DMA page map failed\n");
+ adapter->rx_dma_failed++;
+ goto no_buffers;
}
- /*
- * Refresh the desc even if buffer_addrs
- * didn't change because each write-back
- * erases this info.
- */
- rx_desc->read.buffer_addr[j+1] =
- cpu_to_le64(ps_page->dma);
- } else {
- rx_desc->read.buffer_addr[j+1] = ~0;
}
+ /*
+ * Refresh the desc even if buffer_addrs
+ * didn't change because each write-back
+ * erases this info.
+ */
+ rx_desc->read.buffer_addr[j+1] =
+ cpu_to_le64(ps_page->dma);
}
skb = netdev_alloc_skb(netdev,
@@ -953,7 +952,7 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq_ps(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
((length + l1) <= adapter->rx_ps_bsize0)) {
u8 *vaddr;
- ps_page = &rx_ring->ps_pages[i * PS_PAGE_BUFFERS];
+ ps_page = &buffer_info->ps_pages[0];
/* there is no documentation about how to call
* kmap_atomic, so we can't hold the mapping
@@ -977,7 +976,7 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq_ps(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
if (!length)
break;
- ps_page = &rx_ring->ps_pages[(i * PS_PAGE_BUFFERS) + j];
+ ps_page = &buffer_info->ps_pages[j];
pci_unmap_page(pdev, ps_page->dma, PAGE_SIZE,
PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
ps_page->dma = 0;
@@ -1043,7 +1042,6 @@ static void e1000_clean_rx_ring(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
struct e1000_buffer *buffer_info;
struct e1000_ps_page *ps_page;
struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
- unsigned long size;
unsigned int i, j;
/* Free all the Rx ring sk_buffs */
@@ -1075,8 +1073,7 @@ static void e1000_clean_rx_ring(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
}
for (j = 0; j < PS_PAGE_BUFFERS; j++) {
- ps_page = &rx_ring->ps_pages[(i * PS_PAGE_BUFFERS)
- + j];
+ ps_page = &buffer_info->ps_pages[j];
if (!ps_page->page)
break;
pci_unmap_page(pdev, ps_page->dma, PAGE_SIZE,
@@ -1093,12 +1090,6 @@ static void e1000_clean_rx_ring(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
rx_ring->rx_skb_top = NULL;
}
- size = sizeof(struct e1000_buffer) * rx_ring->count;
- memset(rx_ring->buffer_info, 0, size);
- size = sizeof(struct e1000_ps_page)
- * (rx_ring->count * PS_PAGE_BUFFERS);
- memset(rx_ring->ps_pages, 0, size);
-
/* Zero out the descriptor ring */
memset(rx_ring->desc, 0, rx_ring->size);
@@ -1421,7 +1412,8 @@ err:
int e1000e_setup_rx_resources(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
{
struct e1000_ring *rx_ring = adapter->rx_ring;
- int size, desc_len, err = -ENOMEM;
+ struct e1000_buffer *buffer_info;
+ int i, size, desc_len, err = -ENOMEM;
size = sizeof(struct e1000_buffer) * rx_ring->count;
rx_ring->buffer_info = vmalloc(size);
@@ -1429,11 +1421,14 @@ int e1000e_setup_rx_resources(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
goto err;
memset(rx_ring->buffer_info, 0, size);
- rx_ring->ps_pages = kcalloc(rx_ring->count * PS_PAGE_BUFFERS,
- sizeof(struct e1000_ps_page),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!rx_ring->ps_pages)
- goto err;
+ for (i = 0; i < rx_ring->count; i++) {
+ buffer_info = &rx_ring->buffer_info[i];
+ buffer_info->ps_pages = kcalloc(PS_PAGE_BUFFERS,
+ sizeof(struct e1000_ps_page),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!buffer_info->ps_pages)
+ goto err_pages;
+ }
desc_len = sizeof(union e1000_rx_desc_packet_split);
@@ -1443,16 +1438,21 @@ int e1000e_setup_rx_resources(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
err = e1000_alloc_ring_dma(adapter, rx_ring);
if (err)
- goto err;
+ goto err_pages;
rx_ring->next_to_clean = 0;
rx_ring->next_to_use = 0;
rx_ring->rx_skb_top = NULL;
return 0;
+
+err_pages:
+ for (i = 0; i < rx_ring->count; i++) {
+ buffer_info = &rx_ring->buffer_info[i];
+ kfree(buffer_info->ps_pages);
+ }
err:
vfree(rx_ring->buffer_info);
- kfree(rx_ring->ps_pages);
ndev_err(adapter->netdev,
"Unable to allocate memory for the transmit descriptor ring\n");
return err;
@@ -1518,15 +1518,17 @@ void e1000e_free_rx_resources(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
struct e1000_ring *rx_ring = adapter->rx_ring;
+ int i;
e1000_clean_rx_ring(adapter);
+ for (i = 0; i < rx_ring->count; i++) {
+ kfree(rx_ring->buffer_info[i].ps_pages);
+ }
+
vfree(rx_ring->buffer_info);
rx_ring->buffer_info = NULL;
- kfree(rx_ring->ps_pages);
- rx_ring->ps_pages = NULL;
-
dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev, rx_ring->size, rx_ring->desc,
rx_ring->dma);
rx_ring->desc = NULL;
next reply other threads:[~2007-10-25 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-25 20:57 Auke Kok [this message]
2007-10-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] e1000e: Fix PBA calculation for jumbo frame packets Auke Kok
2007-10-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] e1000e: Re-enable SECRC - crc stripping Auke Kok
2007-10-25 20:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] e1000e: Remove legacy jumbo frame receive code Auke Kok
2007-10-25 21:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] e1000e: Fix " Kok, Auke
2007-10-29 9:47 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071025205744.32645.59503.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.