cpio command not found

cpio command not found

[Bill Lear]

I just cloned the latest git and it builds ok, but fails when I clone:

% uname -a
Linux gronk.zopyra.com 2.4.9-21 #1 Thu Jan 17 14:16:30 EST 2002 i686 unknown

% git --version
git version gitgui.0.8.4.g9c514

% git clone --bare ~/my_repo
Initialized empty Git repository in /repos/git/my_repo/
/opt/git/bin/git-clone: line 297: cpio: command not found

So, should git not check this when it is building?  I don't remember
this dependence from earlier versions of git.  I have been running git
1.4.xx on this machine for a while...


Bill

Re: cpio command not found

[Karl Hasselström]

On 2007-10-31 06:51:30 -0600, Bill Lear wrote:

> I don't remember this dependence from earlier versions of git. I
> have been running git 1.4.xx on this machine for a while...

When you clone with -l, git uses cpio to hardlink to the original
repository. What has changed is that -l is now used by default when
cloning a repository that's accessed via the file system (as opposed
to over some network protocol).

To work around this, specify the repository location with file://, and
git won't try to hardlink (and hence won't try to use cpio).

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
      www.treskal.com/kalle

Re: cpio command not found

[Bill Lear]

On Wednesday, October 31, 2007 at 14:30:39 (+0100) Karl Hasselström writes:
>On 2007-10-31 06:51:30 -0600, Bill Lear wrote:
>
>> I don't remember this dependence from earlier versions of git. I
>> have been running git 1.4.xx on this machine for a while...
>
>When you clone with -l, git uses cpio to hardlink to the original
>repository. What has changed is that -l is now used by default when
>cloning a repository that's accessed via the file system (as opposed
>to over some network protocol).
>
>To work around this, specify the repository location with file://, and
>git won't try to hardlink (and hence won't try to use cpio).

Hmm, thanks for the workaround, but I don't altogether like leaving
things like this.

If the system does not have cpio, I think the build of git should
complain and fail, or it should activate code that treats any
repository accessed over the file system as it would file://.

No sense in leaving this surprise to the user so late in the cycle.


Bill

Re: cpio command not found

[Allan Wind]

On 2007-10-31T07:54:02-0600, Bill Lear wrote:
> If the system does not have cpio, I think the build of git should
> complain and fail, or it should activate code that treats any
> repository accessed over the file system as it would file://.

git may be build and run on two different hosts, so while the build-time 
check is good there should be a run-time check as well.


/Allan

Re: cpio command not found

[David Symonds]

On 11/1/07, Bill Lear <rael@zopyra.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 31, 2007 at 14:30:39 (+0100) Karl Hasselström writes:
> >On 2007-10-31 06:51:30 -0600, Bill Lear wrote:
> >
> >> I don't remember this dependence from earlier versions of git. I
> >> have been running git 1.4.xx on this machine for a while...
> >
> >When you clone with -l, git uses cpio to hardlink to the original
> >repository. What has changed is that -l is now used by default when
> >cloning a repository that's accessed via the file system (as opposed
> >to over some network protocol).
> >
> >To work around this, specify the repository location with file://, and
> >git won't try to hardlink (and hence won't try to use cpio).
>
> Hmm, thanks for the workaround, but I don't altogether like leaving
> things like this.
>
> If the system does not have cpio, I think the build of git should
> complain and fail, or it should activate code that treats any
> repository accessed over the file system as it would file://.

Something like this could be done at run-time instead. You might
install cpio, but shouldn't require a rebuild of git just to use it.


Dave.

Re: cpio command not found

[Erik Mouw]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 734 bytes --]

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:30:39PM +0100, Karl Hasselstr?m wrote:
> On 2007-10-31 06:51:30 -0600, Bill Lear wrote:
> 
> > I don't remember this dependence from earlier versions of git. I
> > have been running git 1.4.xx on this machine for a while...
> 
> When you clone with -l, git uses cpio to hardlink to the original
> repository. What has changed is that -l is now used by default when
> cloning a repository that's accessed via the file system (as opposed
> to over some network protocol).

Why cpio? What is wrong with ln(1) (every Unix should have one) or
link(2) ?


Erik

-- 
They're all fools. Don't worry. Darwin may be slow, but he'll
eventually get them. -- Matthew Lammers in alt.sysadmin.recovery

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: cpio command not found

[Johannes Schindelin]

Hi,

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Erik Mouw wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:30:39PM +0100, Karl Hasselstr?m wrote:
> > On 2007-10-31 06:51:30 -0600, Bill Lear wrote:
> > 
> > > I don't remember this dependence from earlier versions of git. I 
> > > have been running git 1.4.xx on this machine for a while...
> > 
> > When you clone with -l, git uses cpio to hardlink to the original 
> > repository. What has changed is that -l is now used by default when 
> > cloning a repository that's accessed via the file system (as opposed 
> > to over some network protocol).
> 
> Why cpio? What is wrong with ln(1) (every Unix should have one) or
> link(2) ?

Patch, please?

Ciao,
Dscho

[PATCH] Get rid of cpio in git-clone (was: Re: cpio command not found)

[Erik Mouw]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2046 bytes --]

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:20:47PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Erik Mouw wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:30:39PM +0100, Karl Hasselstr?m wrote:
> > > On 2007-10-31 06:51:30 -0600, Bill Lear wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I don't remember this dependence from earlier versions of git. I 
> > > > have been running git 1.4.xx on this machine for a while...
> > > 
> > > When you clone with -l, git uses cpio to hardlink to the original 
> > > repository. What has changed is that -l is now used by default when 
> > > cloning a repository that's accessed via the file system (as opposed 
> > > to over some network protocol).
> > 
> > Why cpio? What is wrong with ln(1) (every Unix should have one) or
> > link(2) ?
> 
> Patch, please?

Here you go.

Remove dependency on cpio for git-clone. Apparently some POSIX systems
out there don't have cpio, just assume cp is there.

Signed-off-by: Erik Mouw <mouw@nl.linux.org>

diff --git a/INSTALL b/INSTALL
index f1eb404..9074563 100644
--- a/INSTALL
+++ b/INSTALL
@@ -79,8 +79,7 @@ Issues of note:
 	- "perl" and POSIX-compliant shells are needed to use most of
 	  the barebone Porcelainish scripts.
 
-	- "cpio" is used by git-merge for saving and restoring the index,
-	  and by git-clone when doing a local (possibly hardlinked) clone.
+	- "cpio" is used by git-merge for saving and restoring the index.
 
  - Some platform specific issues are dealt with Makefile rules,
    but depending on your specific installation, you may not
diff --git a/git-clone.sh b/git-clone.sh
index 0ea3c24..061534c 100755
--- a/git-clone.sh
+++ b/git-clone.sh
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ yes)
 			fi
 		fi &&
 		cd "$repo" &&
-		find objects -depth -print | cpio -pumd$l "$GIT_DIR/" || exit 1
+		cp -Rp$l objects/ "$GIT_DIR/" || exit 1
 	fi
 	git-ls-remote "$repo" >"$GIT_DIR/CLONE_HEAD" || exit 1
 	;;



-- 
They're all fools. Don't worry. Darwin may be slow, but he'll
eventually get them. -- Matthew Lammers in alt.sysadmin.recovery

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] Get rid of cpio in git-clone (was: Re: cpio command not found)

[Jeff King]

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:14:25PM +0100, Erik Mouw wrote:

> > Patch, please?
> 
> Here you go.

Good, now we have something to critique. :)

> -		find objects -depth -print | cpio -pumd$l "$GIT_DIR/" || exit 1
> +		cp -Rp$l objects/ "$GIT_DIR/" || exit 1

cp -l isn't even close to portable. It's not in POSIX, and doesn't work
on (at least) Solaris.

I think Mike's patch (cpio if available, copy otherwise) is a reasonable
approach. If there are other methods (and I think cp -l is not
unreasonable for systems where it is supported and cpio is unavailable),
then perhaps it is worth trying them one by one and dropping back to
full copy if all fail.

-Peff

Re: cpio command not found

[Mike Hommey]

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 03:06:55PM +0100, Erik Mouw wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:30:39PM +0100, Karl Hasselstr?m wrote:
> > On 2007-10-31 06:51:30 -0600, Bill Lear wrote:
> > 
> > > I don't remember this dependence from earlier versions of git. I
> > > have been running git 1.4.xx on this machine for a while...
> > 
> > When you clone with -l, git uses cpio to hardlink to the original
> > repository. What has changed is that -l is now used by default when
> > cloning a repository that's accessed via the file system (as opposed
> > to over some network protocol).
> 
> Why cpio? What is wrong with ln(1) (every Unix should have one) or
> link(2) ?

Since git-clone is not yet a builtin, and is actually a shell script, it
makes more sense to use cpio than ln.

Mike