* RFC: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
@ 2007-11-01 5:08 Adrian Bunk
2007-11-01 8:39 ` Stefan Richter
2007-11-10 14:33 ` Pierre Ossman
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2007-11-01 5:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I'm about to send a patch that removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all
dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL because they are pointless.
Complete rationale:
- Many people and all distributions are currently forced to enable
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL since the options for many device drivers depend
on this option.
I have yet to see someone not being able to install his favorite
distribution on his computer only because the distribution did choose
to disable all SATA drivers with dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL in their
kernels...
- History has shown that often the dependency on EXPERIMENTAL is not
removed when the code has proven usable.
As an example, is our NFSv4 support really still in an
"alpha-test phase" [1], or is it already ready for being used?
I don't know the answer in this specific case, but I wouldn't answer
"still in an alpha-test phase" only based on the fact that the NFSv4
options still depend on EXPERIMENTAL.
- It might have been differently 10 years ago, but today everything that
is available in a released kernel should also be in a usable state.
cu
Adrian
[1] quoted from the CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL help text
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
2007-11-01 5:08 RFC: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL Adrian Bunk
@ 2007-11-01 8:39 ` Stefan Richter
2007-11-10 14:33 ` Pierre Ossman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Richter @ 2007-11-01 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: linux-kernel
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I'm about to send a patch that removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all
> dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL because they are pointless.
FWIW, I agree.
[...]
> As an example, is our NFSv4 support really still in an
> "alpha-test phase" [1], or is it already ready for being used?
[...]
> [1] quoted from the CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL help text
I don't know about NFSv4 in particular, but I think we have the whole
palette, from "alpha" software which is basically ready for production,
to buggy incomplete software which is heavily in production and trains
users to lower their expectations.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== =-== ----=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
2007-11-01 5:08 RFC: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL Adrian Bunk
2007-11-01 8:39 ` Stefan Richter
@ 2007-11-10 14:33 ` Pierre Ossman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pierre Ossman @ 2007-11-10 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 06:08:55 +0100
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
> - History has shown that often the dependency on EXPERIMENTAL is not
> removed when the code has proven usable.
Guilty as charged. Feel free to kill any references to experimental for sdhci.
(I also support the general sentiment)
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-10 14:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-01 5:08 RFC: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL Adrian Bunk
2007-11-01 8:39 ` Stefan Richter
2007-11-10 14:33 ` Pierre Ossman
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.