All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: chrisw@sous-sol.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: clear thread flag for new children
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:23:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071101172324.GA3938@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711011033.53265.sgrubb@redhat.com>

On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 10:33:52AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Monday 29 October 2007 07:15:30 pm Tony Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:04:31PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > So when audit is re-enabled, how do you make that task auditable?
> >
> > No idea. How do you do it currently? HINT: current->audit_context == NULL
> > for these tasks.  If !audit_enabled, then audit_alloc() is not going to
> > allocate an audit_context for the task.
> 
> We are looking into this - at one time it did. Someone should follow up with 
> a path correcting this soon. But I doubt the audit system will work correctly 
> if the flag gets removed as there is no good way to add it again later.

So on the syscall path you're now going to something like (pseudocode):
if (unlikely(current->audit_context)) {audit_syscall_entry()} 
else if (audit_enabled) {audit_alloc(); audit_syscall_entry()}

I agree, if this is what you want to do, then clearing the thread flag would
be a bad idea.  I'd assumed the current behaviour was by design as allocating
contexts at syscall time doesn't seem a great idea but if you need the 
functionality, you need the functionality.

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	chrisw@sous-sol.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: clear thread flag for new children
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:23:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071101172324.GA3938@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711011033.53265.sgrubb@redhat.com>

On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 10:33:52AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Monday 29 October 2007 07:15:30 pm Tony Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:04:31PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > So when audit is re-enabled, how do you make that task auditable?
> >
> > No idea. How do you do it currently? HINT: current->audit_context == NULL
> > for these tasks.  If !audit_enabled, then audit_alloc() is not going to
> > allocate an audit_context for the task.
> 
> We are looking into this - at one time it did. Someone should follow up with 
> a path correcting this soon. But I doubt the audit system will work correctly 
> if the flag gets removed as there is no good way to add it again later.

So on the syscall path you're now going to something like (pseudocode):
if (unlikely(current->audit_context)) {audit_syscall_entry()} 
else if (audit_enabled) {audit_alloc(); audit_syscall_entry()}

I agree, if this is what you want to do, then clearing the thread flag would
be a bad idea.  I'd assumed the current behaviour was by design as allocating
contexts at syscall time doesn't seem a great idea but if you need the 
functionality, you need the functionality.

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-01 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-26 20:42 [PATCH] audit: clear thread flag for new children Tony Jones
2007-10-26 20:42 ` Tony Jones
2007-10-26 22:42 ` Chris Wright
2007-10-27 14:21 ` Steve Grubb
2007-10-27 14:21   ` Steve Grubb
2007-10-29 17:20   ` Tony Jones
2007-10-29 17:20     ` Tony Jones
2007-10-29 22:04     ` Steve Grubb
2007-10-29 22:04       ` Steve Grubb
2007-10-29 23:15       ` Tony Jones
2007-10-29 23:15         ` Tony Jones
2007-11-01 14:33         ` Steve Grubb
2007-11-01 14:33           ` Steve Grubb
2007-11-01 17:23           ` Tony Jones [this message]
2007-11-01 17:23             ` Tony Jones
2007-11-01 18:34             ` Steve Grubb
2007-11-01 18:34               ` Steve Grubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071101172324.GA3938@suse.de \
    --to=tonyj@suse.de \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.