Re: m68k build failure

[Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>]

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:00:56AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > No the slightest. 12 seems like the correct, padded size. A size of 10 is just weird as the unpadded size is 9 bytes. Could you dump the __mod_sdio_device_table section so we can determine if it is cropped or just oddly padded.
> > 
> 
> err, I'd rather not.  I have no shortage of bugs to be going on with here.
> 
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/cross-compilers/ has the i386->m68k
> cross-compiler which I use.

Eh...  m68k has 16bit alignment for unsigned long.  

diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
--- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
+++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
@@ -343,7 +343,8 @@ struct sdio_device_id {
 	__u8	class;			/* Standard interface or SDIO_ANY_ID */
 	__u16	vendor;			/* Vendor or SDIO_ANY_ID */
 	__u16	device;			/* Device ID or SDIO_ANY_ID */
-	kernel_ulong_t driver_data;	/* Data private to the driver */
+	kernel_ulong_t driver_data	/* Data private to the driver */
+		__attribute__((aligned(sizeof(kernel_ulong_t))));
 };
 
 /* SSB core, see drivers/ssb/ */