From: Anders Henke <anders.henke@1und1.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
matthew@wil.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com
Subject: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory)
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:14:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071205101441.GO7697@1und1.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071204185152.880af2cf.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:30:54 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:11:55 -0800
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:04:03 +0900
> > > FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:57:38 -0800
> > > > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:31:50 +0100
> > > > > Anders Henke <anders.henke@1und1.de> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On November 28 2007, Anders Henke wrote:
> > > > > > > As "everything is reported as being zero" is quite odd an Jan took a
> > > > > > > guess that it might be block-layer or driver-related, I've assumed
> > > > > > > that the driver is responsible for this; just out of the curiousity,
> > > > > > > I've manually replaced the dpt_i2o driver by the 2.6.19 one by copying
> > > > > > > driver/scsi/dpt_i2o.c driver/scsi/dpti.h and driver/scsi/dpt/ into a
> > > > > > > vanilla 2.6.23.1. kernel; using this kernel fixed the issue for me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I haven't yet fine-tested from which kernel release on the dpt_i2o driver
> > > > > > > behaves like this and spews out zeroed blocks when trying to mount
> > > > > > > the rootfs. Maybe this is just some timing issue.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've started the fine-tests and can say so far that dpt_i2o from
> > > > > > 2.6.22 is still fine. Test is simple:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > anders@ista:/usr/src/linux-2.6.22/drivers/scsi/dpt$ cp -r dpt/ dpt_i2o.c dpti.h /usr/src/linux-2.6.23.1/drivers/scsi/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ... recompile the kernel, reboot: works.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 differ in terms of the dpt_i2o driver by two different
> > > > > > patch sets:
> > > > > > -one 2 Kb small set of patches from 2.6.22 to 2.6.22-rc1
> > > > > > -one 7 Kb set of patches from 2.6.23-rc2 to 2.6.23-rc3
> > > > > > -one 162 Kb set of patches from 2.6.23-rc9 to 2.6.23-rc10.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When applying the 2.6.23-rc1-based driver to "my" 2.6.31.1 kernel,
> > > > > > the "zero blocks"-symptom show up, so it's the "lucky" situation
> > > > > > that the smallest patch actually seams to be the broken one.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > According to the 2.6.23-rc1 short-form changelog, there is
> > > > > > one major edit on the dpt_i2o driver:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FUJITA Tomonori
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [SCSI] dpt_i2o: convert to use the data buffer accessors
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Stephen Rothwell
> > > > > > dpt_i2o depends on virt_to_bus
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fujita, would you please take a look at this?
> > > > >
> > > > > He won't have seen this. cc's added.
> > > > >
> > > > > > I think that something's broken in there, leading to the dpt_i2o
> > > > > > sending out blocks of zeroes right after initialization, at least on
> > > > > > some specific controllers (in this case, Adaptec 2010S on Intel
> > > > > > SE7501WV2S-based boxes).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't have insight kernel driver development knowledge, so I'm
> > > > > > quite out of help right now. Nevertheless, I'll add the diff
> > > > > > from 2.6.22 to 2.6.23-rc1 in terms of dpt_i2o:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you please confirm that this revert (against 2.6.24-rc4) fixes the data
> > > > > corruption problems?
> > > >
> > > > Anders said that my patch is fine and seems that Matthew's hotplug
> > > > conversion patch leads to the problem:
> > > >
> > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119641892129732&w=2
> > >
> > > Oh. Jan broke message threading :(
> > >
> > > So it's been nearly a week and nothing has happened? Do we revert that
> > > change?
> >
> > SCSI people really want this conversion...
> >
> > Matthew, did you have a chance to look at it?
>
> It seems pretty improbably that a change of that nature could cause data
> corruption. Anders, are you able to determine whether the revert (against
> current Linus mainline or 2.6.24-rc4) fixes things? Because it would be
> very strange...
>
> This is a grave bug. It's really quite urgent...
>
> Thanks.
>
> drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> drivers/scsi/dpti.h | 9 ++
> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
I've done the following:
-untared a clean 2.6.24-rc4 and compiled it with my 2.6.23.1-settings in order
to verify that the driver is still broken: checked, the box still won't
boot.
-patched the just compiled kernel source with your patch, "make dist-clean"
(by means of "make-kpkg clean") and recompile: box boots fine.
I've put the captured console logs to
http://w.sysiphus.de/dpt_i2o/bootlog.2624-rc4-pristine
http://w.sysiphus.de/dpt_i2o/bootlog.2624-rc4-patched
... and the kernelconfig (which shouldn't matter) to
http://w.sysiphus.de/dpt_i2o/kernelconfig.2624-rc4
Regards,
Anders
--
1&1 Internet AG Enter any 11-digit prime number to continue.
Brauerstrasse 48 v://49.721.91374.50
D-76135 Karlsruhe f://49.721.91374.225
Amtsgericht Montabaur HRB 6484
Vorstand: Henning Ahlert, Ralph Dommermuth, Matthias Ehrlich, Andreas Gauger,
Thomas Gottschlich, Matthias Greve, Robert Hoffmann, Norbert Lang, Achim Weiss
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Michael Scheeren
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-05 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-28 17:21 broken dpt_i2o (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) Anders Henke
2007-11-29 12:31 ` broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 " Anders Henke
2007-12-05 0:57 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-05 1:04 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2007-12-05 1:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-05 1:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-05 1:30 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2007-12-05 2:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-05 10:14 ` Anders Henke [this message]
2007-12-06 5:49 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2007-12-06 7:08 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071205101441.GO7697@1und1.de \
--to=anders.henke@1und1.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.