All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: anders.henke@1und1.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
	fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory)
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:11:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071204171155.33ea58c9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071205100403Y.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>

On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:04:03 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:57:38 -0800
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:31:50 +0100
> > Anders Henke <anders.henke@1und1.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > On November 28 2007, Anders Henke wrote:
> > > > As "everything is reported as being zero" is quite odd an Jan took a
> > > > guess that it might be block-layer or driver-related, I've assumed
> > > > that the driver is responsible for this; just out of the curiousity, 
> > > > I've manually replaced the dpt_i2o driver by the 2.6.19 one by copying 
> > > > driver/scsi/dpt_i2o.c driver/scsi/dpti.h and driver/scsi/dpt/ into a 
> > > > vanilla 2.6.23.1. kernel; using this kernel fixed the issue for me.
> > > > 
> > > > I haven't yet fine-tested from which kernel release on the dpt_i2o driver 
> > > > behaves like this and spews out zeroed blocks when trying to mount
> > > > the rootfs. Maybe this is just some timing issue.
> > > 
> > > I've started the fine-tests and can say so far that dpt_i2o from 
> > > 2.6.22 is still fine. Test is simple:
> > > 
> > > anders@ista:/usr/src/linux-2.6.22/drivers/scsi/dpt$ cp -r dpt/ dpt_i2o.c dpti.h /usr/src/linux-2.6.23.1/drivers/scsi/
> > > 
> > > ... recompile the kernel, reboot: works.
> > > 
> > > 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 differ in terms of the dpt_i2o driver by two different
> > > patch sets:
> > > -one 2 Kb small set of patches from 2.6.22 to 2.6.22-rc1
> > > -one 7 Kb set of patches from 2.6.23-rc2 to 2.6.23-rc3
> > > -one 162 Kb set of patches from 2.6.23-rc9 to 2.6.23-rc10.
> > > 
> > > When applying the 2.6.23-rc1-based driver to "my" 2.6.31.1 kernel,
> > > the "zero blocks"-symptom show up, so it's the "lucky" situation
> > > that the smallest patch actually seams to be the broken one.
> > > 
> > > According to the 2.6.23-rc1 short-form changelog, there is
> > > one major edit on the dpt_i2o driver:
> > > 
> > > FUJITA Tomonori 
> > > 
> > >       [SCSI] dpt_i2o: convert to use the data buffer accessors
> > > 
> > > Stephen Rothwell 
> > >       dpt_i2o depends on virt_to_bus
> > > 
> > > Fujita, would you please take a look at this?
> > 
> > He won't have seen this.  cc's added.
> > 
> > > I think that something's broken in there, leading to the dpt_i2o 
> > > sending out blocks of zeroes right after initialization, at least on
> > > some specific controllers (in this case, Adaptec 2010S on Intel
> > > SE7501WV2S-based boxes).
> > > 
> > > I don't have insight kernel driver development knowledge, so I'm
> > > quite out of help right now. Nevertheless, I'll add the diff
> > > from 2.6.22 to 2.6.23-rc1 in terms of dpt_i2o:
> > > 
> > 
> > Can you please confirm that this revert (against 2.6.24-rc4) fixes the data
> > corruption problems?
> 
> Anders said that my patch is fine and seems that Matthew's hotplug
> conversion patch leads to the problem:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119641892129732&w=2

Oh.  Jan broke message threading :(

So it's been nearly a week and nothing has happened?  Do we revert that
change?


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: anders.henke@1und1.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
	fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory)
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:11:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071204171155.33ea58c9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071205100403Y.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>

On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:04:03 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:57:38 -0800
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:31:50 +0100
> > Anders Henke <anders.henke@1und1.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > On November 28 2007, Anders Henke wrote:
> > > > As "everything is reported as being zero" is quite odd an Jan took a
> > > > guess that it might be block-layer or driver-related, I've assumed
> > > > that the driver is responsible for this; just out of the curiousity, 
> > > > I've manually replaced the dpt_i2o driver by the 2.6.19 one by copying 
> > > > driver/scsi/dpt_i2o.c driver/scsi/dpti.h and driver/scsi/dpt/ into a 
> > > > vanilla 2.6.23.1. kernel; using this kernel fixed the issue for me.
> > > > 
> > > > I haven't yet fine-tested from which kernel release on the dpt_i2o driver 
> > > > behaves like this and spews out zeroed blocks when trying to mount
> > > > the rootfs. Maybe this is just some timing issue.
> > > 
> > > I've started the fine-tests and can say so far that dpt_i2o from 
> > > 2.6.22 is still fine. Test is simple:
> > > 
> > > anders@ista:/usr/src/linux-2.6.22/drivers/scsi/dpt$ cp -r dpt/ dpt_i2o.c dpti.h /usr/src/linux-2.6.23.1/drivers/scsi/
> > > 
> > > ... recompile the kernel, reboot: works.
> > > 
> > > 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 differ in terms of the dpt_i2o driver by two different
> > > patch sets:
> > > -one 2 Kb small set of patches from 2.6.22 to 2.6.22-rc1
> > > -one 7 Kb set of patches from 2.6.23-rc2 to 2.6.23-rc3
> > > -one 162 Kb set of patches from 2.6.23-rc9 to 2.6.23-rc10.
> > > 
> > > When applying the 2.6.23-rc1-based driver to "my" 2.6.31.1 kernel,
> > > the "zero blocks"-symptom show up, so it's the "lucky" situation
> > > that the smallest patch actually seams to be the broken one.
> > > 
> > > According to the 2.6.23-rc1 short-form changelog, there is
> > > one major edit on the dpt_i2o driver:
> > > 
> > > FUJITA Tomonori 
> > > 
> > >       [SCSI] dpt_i2o: convert to use the data buffer accessors
> > > 
> > > Stephen Rothwell 
> > >       dpt_i2o depends on virt_to_bus
> > > 
> > > Fujita, would you please take a look at this?
> > 
> > He won't have seen this.  cc's added.
> > 
> > > I think that something's broken in there, leading to the dpt_i2o 
> > > sending out blocks of zeroes right after initialization, at least on
> > > some specific controllers (in this case, Adaptec 2010S on Intel
> > > SE7501WV2S-based boxes).
> > > 
> > > I don't have insight kernel driver development knowledge, so I'm
> > > quite out of help right now. Nevertheless, I'll add the diff
> > > from 2.6.22 to 2.6.23-rc1 in terms of dpt_i2o:
> > > 
> > 
> > Can you please confirm that this revert (against 2.6.24-rc4) fixes the data
> > corruption problems?
> 
> Anders said that my patch is fine and seems that Matthew's hotplug
> conversion patch leads to the problem:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119641892129732&w=2

Oh.  Jan broke message threading :(

So it's been nearly a week and nothing has happened?  Do we revert that
change?


  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-05  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-28 17:21 broken dpt_i2o (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) Anders Henke
2007-11-29 12:31 ` broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 " Anders Henke
2007-12-05  0:57   ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-05  1:04     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2007-12-05  1:11       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-12-05  1:11         ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-05  1:30         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2007-12-05  2:51           ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-05 10:14             ` Anders Henke
2007-12-06  5:49               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2007-12-06  7:08                 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071204171155.33ea58c9.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anders.henke@1und1.de \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.