All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>, Peter Leckie <pleckie@sgi.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Important regression with XFS update for 2.6.24-rc6
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:28:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071218112804.GA3069@localhost.localdomain> (raw)

Hello,

As a follow-up to
<http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119796120524618&w=2> (LKML seems
down right now so I am not linking to it), I have detected an important
problem with these two patches: after applying them by hand (downloaded
them raw from SGI's gitweb) on top of 2.6.24-rc5-git5 (they have not yet
been pulled into mainline by Linux as of this morning) for testing
purposes, I noticed upon reboot that "ls -l" on directories with many
files and subdirectories (around 5000 entries) takes several hundreds of
MB in RAM and then dies with "memory exhausted" error.

I also noticed that ldconfig takes a lot of time to complete, and
firefox seems also to eat much more memory than usual. Reverting the two
patches (going back to vanilla rc5-git5) makes these problems go away.
I am not able to test right now if only one of the patches is bogus or
if both of them are concerned.

As the symptoms are easy to reproduce, I guess this is some kind of
brown paper bag bug and will be easy for XFS experts to spot.


Best,

-- 
Damien Wyart

             reply	other threads:[~2007-12-18 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-18 11:28 Damien Wyart [this message]
2007-12-18 12:24 ` Important regression with XFS update for 2.6.24-rc6 David Chinner
2007-12-18 14:30   ` Damien Wyart
2007-12-18 15:19     ` David Chinner
2007-12-19 10:45       ` David Chinner
2007-12-19 11:17         ` Damien Wyart
2007-12-19 11:31           ` David Chinner
2007-12-20  1:56         ` [review please] " David Chinner
2007-12-20  5:01           ` Timothy Shimmin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071218112804.GA3069@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=damien.wyart@free.fr \
    --cc=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=lachlan@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=pleckie@sgi.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.