From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
bryan.wu@analog.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore blackfin HARDWARE_PM support
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:23:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071228192320.GI6780@does.not.exist> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071228191404.GB21353@Krystal>
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 02:14:04PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk (adrian.bunk@movial.fi) wrote:
> > This patch restores the blackfin Hardware Performance Monitor Profiling
> > support that was killed by
> > commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@movial.fi>
> >
>
> Yep, this one too must be put back, but kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> seems like the wrong spot for a blackfin-specific config option (and
> this will break the instrumentation menu removal patches in -mm).
>
> Can we put this in arch/blackfin/Kconfig instead ?
No, this is a user visible option that belongs into the same menu as
"Profling support".
> > ---
> >
> > kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > 942996f33f81726c5edb012d61ecdad70c55884d
> > diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation b/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> > index 97c76ca..e023671 100644
> > --- a/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> > +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> > @@ -44,2 +44,11 @@ config OPROFILE_MPCORE
> >
> > +config HARDWARE_PM
> > + tristate "Hardware Performance Monitor Profiling"
> > + depends on BLACKFIN && PROFILING
> > + help
> > + take use of hardware performance monitor to profiling the kernel
> > + and application.
> > +
> > + If unsure, say N.
> > +
> > config KPROBES
> >
>
> Mathieu Desnoyers
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-28 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-28 18:56 [2.6.24 patch] restore blackfin HARDWARE_PM support Adrian Bunk
2007-12-28 19:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-28 19:23 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-12-28 19:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-29 6:14 ` Robin Getz
2007-12-29 6:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-29 19:28 ` Robin Getz
2007-12-29 16:29 ` [2.6.24 patch] Fix " Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-02 17:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071228192320.GI6780@does.not.exist \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bryan.wu@analog.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.