All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	bryan.wu@analog.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore blackfin HARDWARE_PM support
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:23:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071228192320.GI6780@does.not.exist> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071228191404.GB21353@Krystal>

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 02:14:04PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk (adrian.bunk@movial.fi) wrote:
> > This patch restores the blackfin Hardware Performance Monitor Profiling 
> > support that was killed by
> > commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@movial.fi>
> > 
> 
> Yep, this one too must be put back, but kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> seems like the wrong spot for a blackfin-specific config option (and
> this will break the instrumentation menu removal patches in -mm).
> 
> Can we put this in arch/blackfin/Kconfig instead ?

No, this is a user visible option that belongs into the same menu as
"Profling support".

> > ---
> > 
> >  kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation |    9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > 
> > 942996f33f81726c5edb012d61ecdad70c55884d 
> > diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation b/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> > index 97c76ca..e023671 100644
> > --- a/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> > +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> > @@ -44,2 +44,11 @@ config OPROFILE_MPCORE
> >  
> > +config HARDWARE_PM
> > +	tristate "Hardware Performance Monitor Profiling"
> > +	depends on BLACKFIN && PROFILING
> > +	help
> > +	  take use of hardware performance monitor to profiling the kernel
> > +	  and application.
> > +
> > +	  If unsure, say N.
> > +
> >  config KPROBES
> > 
> 
> Mathieu Desnoyers

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-28 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-28 18:56 [2.6.24 patch] restore blackfin HARDWARE_PM support Adrian Bunk
2007-12-28 19:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-28 19:23   ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-12-28 19:28     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-29  6:14       ` Robin Getz
2007-12-29  6:23         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-29 19:28           ` Robin Getz
2007-12-29 16:29         ` [2.6.24 patch] Fix " Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-02 17:46           ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071228192320.GI6780@does.not.exist \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bryan.wu@analog.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.