All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Robin Getz <rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	bryan.wu@analog.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore blackfin HARDWARE_PM support
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:23:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071229062326.GA16853@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200712290114.46694.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>

* Robin Getz (rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org) wrote:
> On Fri 28 Dec 2007 14:28, Mathieu Desnoyers pondered:
> > * Adrian Bunk (bunk@kernel.org) wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 02:14:04PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > > * Adrian Bunk (adrian.bunk@movial.fi) wrote:
> > > > > This patch restores the blackfin Hardware Performance Monitor Profiling 
> > > > > support that was killed by
> > > > > commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@movial.fi>
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Yep, this one too must be put back, but kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> > > > seems like the wrong spot for a blackfin-specific config option (and
> > > > this will break the instrumentation menu removal patches in -mm).
> > > > 
> > > > Can we put this in arch/blackfin/Kconfig instead ?
> > > 
> > > No, this is a user visible option that belongs into the same menu as
> > > "Profling support".
> > > 
> > 
> > Actually, I wonder why these options exist at all rather than being on
> > by default when profiling is enabled. There is no such thing as
> > "activating the performance monitor profiling" on other architectures.
> > What is so special about blackfin that makes it need it ?
> 
> This is probably more historical, and you are correct - it should just be part of profiling.
> 

Ok, and do we really need to make HARDWARE_PM a tristate ? I see that
part of it must be compiled into the kernel in core .S files. Does it
really make sense for it to be a module ?

Also, op_model_bf533.c sits in the arch/blackfin/oprofile directory,
(built if HARDWARE_PM is y or m) but depends on PROFILING, not OPROFILE.
Is HARDWARE_PM useful at all without OPROFILE ?

> 
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > >  kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation |    9 +++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > 942996f33f81726c5edb012d61ecdad70c55884d 
> > > > > diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation b/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> > > > > index 97c76ca..e023671 100644
> > > > > --- a/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> > > > > +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> > > > > @@ -44,2 +44,11 @@ config OPROFILE_MPCORE
> > > > >  
> > > > > +config HARDWARE_PM
> > > > > +	tristate "Hardware Performance Monitor Profiling"
> > > > > +	depends on BLACKFIN && PROFILING
> > > > > +	help
> > > > > +	  take use of hardware performance monitor to profiling the kernel
> > > > > +	  and application.
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	  If unsure, say N.
> > > > > +
> > > > >  config KPROBES
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Mathieu Desnoyers
> > > 
> > > cu
> > > Adrian
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 
> > >        "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
> > >         of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
> > >        "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
> > >                                        Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
> > > 
> > 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-29  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-28 18:56 [2.6.24 patch] restore blackfin HARDWARE_PM support Adrian Bunk
2007-12-28 19:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-28 19:23   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-28 19:28     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-29  6:14       ` Robin Getz
2007-12-29  6:23         ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2007-12-29 19:28           ` Robin Getz
2007-12-29 16:29         ` [2.6.24 patch] Fix " Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-02 17:46           ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071229062326.GA16853@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bryan.wu@analog.com \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.