All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] USB Kconfig: Select SCSI for USB Mass Storage support
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:59:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080106115941.GB2082@does.not.exist> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4780BBAA.7020908@s5r6.in-berlin.de>

On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 12:29:46PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 01:35:21AM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> >> instead work on better UIs if you have got
> >> trouble with the complexities of the dependencies graph.  The graphic
> >> UIs including menuconfig currently work best for tree-like dependencies,
> >> but the graph isn't a tree.  Think about how to present this properly in
> >> an UI.  The Kconfig files are the wrong place to attack this problem.
> >> ...
> > 
> > Duplicating the structure in each UI should be an improvement?
> > 
> > Hardly.
> 
> What do you mean?
> 
> We have dependency data in the Kconfig files.  We have a few different
> UIs to them.  Why there are different UIs is easy (oldconfig vs.
> xconfig) or not so easy (gconfig vs. xconfig) to explain.  Anyway; IMO
> we should keep data and presentation separate for at least two reasons:
>   - to allow us to have specialized task-oriented UIs (oldconfig,
>     randconfig et cetera)
>   - because different people have different approaches to kernel
>     configuration (the guy who sets up a new box vs. the guy who bought
>     a new gadget vs. the guy who updates his kernel vs. the control
>     freak vs. the kernel tester vs...)
>...

You said:
"The graphic UIs including menuconfig currently work best for tree-like 
 dependencies"

That's true.

And the dependency graph can't be a tree.

Currently, defining the ordered tree the UIs present to the user is done 
_once_ in kconfig.

Our UIs either show this tree as a tree or go through the tree 
depth-first and present the options in this order to the user.

And I think your main misunderstanding is that you think the 
dependencies alone would carry enough information for allowing an UI to 
present the options in a way not worse than it's currently done - that's 
simply not true.

> Stefan Richter

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-06 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-05 15:41 [PATCH 2/5] USB Kconfig: Select SCSI for USB Mass Storage support Al Boldi
2008-01-05 18:42 ` David Brownell
2008-01-05 19:30 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-01-05 21:03   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-05 21:09     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-05 23:22       ` Randy Dunlap
2008-01-05 23:45         ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-06  0:35           ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06  0:58             ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-06 11:29               ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 11:59                 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-01-06 12:32                   ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 12:58                     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-06 13:23                       ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 12:18               ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 12:37                 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-06 13:13                   ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 13:38                     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-06 13:55                       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-06 13:57                       ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 14:45                     ` david
2008-01-06 13:41                       ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 15:05                         ` david
2008-01-06 14:08                           ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 17:11                           ` Alan Stern
2008-01-06 18:07                             ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06  1:01             ` Randy Dunlap
2008-01-06 11:54         ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 12:05           ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-06 12:41             ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06  5:03       ` Al Boldi
2008-01-06 14:39         ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 17:07           ` Al Boldi
2008-01-06 17:50             ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 18:01               ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 18:23               ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-05 20:40 ` Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080106115941.GB2082@does.not.exist \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.