From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, a.zummo@towertech.it,
peterz@infradead.org, cbou@mail.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
david-b@pacbell.net, krh@redhat.com,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, dwmw2@infradead.org,
davem@davemloft.net, jarkao2@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] convert semaphore to mutex in struct class
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:45:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080107084528.GA8365@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080107020944.GA3637@darkstar.te-china.tietoenator.com>
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:09:44AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>
> Thanks for your comment, I rewrite it for 2.6.24-rc7 as a all-in-one
> patch, please see following. Drop i2c maintainer and list in cc
> because there's no changes about i2c in this patch:
>
> Convert semaphore to mutex in struct class
Most of the non-driver core code should be converted to not use the
lock in the class at all. They should use a local lock instead.
So how about a patch series that removes the usage of the current
semaphore from the different drivers, and then, a single patch that
converts the semaphore to mutex in the class code, it should not touch
anything outside of the drivers/base/ directory (not including the
driver.h file.)
Sound reasonable?
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
stern@rowland.harvard.edu, peterz@infradead.org,
david-b@pacbell.net, davem@davemloft.net, jarkao2@gmail.com,
krh@redhat.com, dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, a.zummo@towertech.it,
cbou@mail.ru, dwmw2@infradead.org,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] convert semaphore to mutex in struct class
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:45:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080107084528.GA8365@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080107020944.GA3637@darkstar.te-china.tietoenator.com>
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:09:44AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>
> Thanks for your comment, I rewrite it for 2.6.24-rc7 as a all-in-one
> patch, please see following. Drop i2c maintainer and list in cc
> because there's no changes about i2c in this patch:
>
> Convert semaphore to mutex in struct class
Most of the non-driver core code should be converted to not use the
lock in the class at all. They should use a local lock instead.
So how about a patch series that removes the usage of the current
semaphore from the different drivers, and then, a single patch that
converts the semaphore to mutex in the class code, it should not touch
anything outside of the drivers/base/ directory (not including the
driver.h file.)
Sound reasonable?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-07 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-03 5:50 [PATCH 0/7] convert semaphore to mutex in struct class Dave Young
2008-01-03 7:06 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-03 7:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-03 7:21 ` Dave Young
2008-01-03 7:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-06 18:41 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-07 2:09 ` Dave Young
2008-01-07 2:09 ` Dave Young
2008-01-07 8:45 ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-01-07 8:45 ` Greg KH
2008-01-07 9:01 ` David Brownell
2008-01-07 9:01 ` David Brownell
2008-01-07 13:23 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-07 13:23 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-07 14:00 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-07 14:00 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-07 16:36 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-07 15:44 ` Greg KH
2008-01-07 15:44 ` Greg KH
2008-01-07 17:13 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-07 17:20 ` Greg KH
2008-01-08 7:05 ` Dave Young
2008-01-08 22:48 ` Greg KH
2008-01-08 22:48 ` Greg KH
2008-01-09 1:32 ` Dave Young
2008-01-09 1:32 ` Dave Young
2008-01-09 6:13 ` Dave Young
2008-01-09 6:13 ` Dave Young
2008-01-09 6:37 ` Dave Young
2008-01-09 6:39 ` Dave Young
2008-01-09 6:39 ` Dave Young
2008-01-10 9:48 ` Dave Young
2008-01-10 12:34 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-10 12:34 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-11 2:18 ` Dave Young
2008-01-11 2:18 ` Dave Young
2008-01-10 13:23 ` Cornelia Huck
2008-01-11 2:33 ` Dave Young
2008-01-11 2:33 ` Dave Young
2008-01-11 8:23 ` Cornelia Huck
2008-01-11 8:53 ` Dave Young
2008-01-11 8:53 ` Dave Young
2008-01-10 15:41 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-10 15:41 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-11 2:37 ` Dave Young
2008-01-11 2:37 ` Dave Young
2008-01-10 18:39 ` Greg KH
2008-01-11 2:40 ` Dave Young
2008-01-11 2:40 ` Dave Young
2008-01-07 17:25 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-07 17:25 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-07 10:00 ` Dave Young
2008-01-07 10:00 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080107084528.GA8365@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=cbou@mail.ru \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=krh@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.