2.6.24-rc8-mm1 and SELinux MLS - not playing nice....

2.6.24-rc8-mm1 and SELinux MLS - not playing nice....

[Valdis.Kletnieks]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1428 bytes --]

Posting to both lists because I'm not sure who's at fault here....

System is a Dell Latitude D820, x86_64 kernel, userspace is basically
Fedora Rawhide as of earlier today, in particular selinux-policy-mls-3.2.5-12.fc9

Trying to boot a 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 kernel gets me these msgs:

security:  5 users, 8 roles, 2043 types, 102 bools, 16 sens, 1024 cats
security:  67 classes, 164754 rules
security:  class peer not defined in policy
security:  permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy
security:  permission sendto in class node not defined in policy
security:  permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy
security:  permission egress in class netif not defined in policy
security:  permission forward_in in class packet not found in policy, bad policy
security:  the definition of a class is incorrect

2.6.24-rc6-mm1 said this instead:

security:  class peer not defined in policy
security:  permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy
security:  permission sendto in class node not defined in policy
security:  permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy
security:  permission egress in class netif not defined in policy
SELinux: policy loaded with handle_unknown=deny

and then proceeded to work OK.

(I suspect this may be the same thing Andrew Morton hit, but I can't be sure).

Anybody got hints on how to move forward?  Or is a fixed policy already in the
Rawhide pipe?


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 and SELinux MLS - not playing nice....

[James Morris]

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

> Posting to both lists because I'm not sure who's at fault here....
> 
> System is a Dell Latitude D820, x86_64 kernel, userspace is basically
> Fedora Rawhide as of earlier today, in particular selinux-policy-mls-3.2.5-12.fc9
> 
> Trying to boot a 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 kernel gets me these msgs:
> 
> security:  5 users, 8 roles, 2043 types, 102 bools, 16 sens, 1024 cats
> security:  67 classes, 164754 rules
> security:  class peer not defined in policy
> security:  permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy
> security:  permission sendto in class node not defined in policy
> security:  permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy
> security:  permission egress in class netif not defined in policy
> security:  permission forward_in in class packet not found in policy, bad policy
> security:  the definition of a class is incorrect

This looks the same as what akpm hit.  Paul Moore has updated his labeled 
networking patches (see Subject: [RFC PATCH v12 00/18] Labeled networking 
changes for 2.6.25), and you could try dropping those into the broken out 
-mm in place of the existing git patch, or just wait for a new -mm.

> 
> 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 said this instead:
> 
> security:  class peer not defined in policy
> security:  permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy
> security:  permission sendto in class node not defined in policy
> security:  permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy
> security:  permission egress in class netif not defined in policy
> SELinux: policy loaded with handle_unknown=deny
> 
> and then proceeded to work OK.
> 
> (I suspect this may be the same thing Andrew Morton hit, but I can't be sure).
> 
> Anybody got hints on how to move forward?  Or is a fixed policy already in the
> Rawhide pipe?
> 
> 

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 and SELinux MLS - not playing nice....

[Valdis.Kletnieks]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2661 bytes --]

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:17:00 +1100, James Morris said:

> This looks the same as what akpm hit.  Paul Moore has updated his labeled 
> networking patches (see Subject: [RFC PATCH v12 00/18] Labeled networking 
> changes for 2.6.25), and you could try dropping those into the broken out 
> -mm in place of the existing git patch, or just wait for a new -mm.

Confirming - I took V12 0-18, cat'ed it into one file, plopped that on top
of the broken-out/git-lblnet.patch and quilted up a test -rc8-mm1 and that
booted without complaints - dmesg says:

SELinux:8192 avtab hash slots allocated. Num of rules:164754
SELinux:8192 avtab hash slots allocated. Num of rules:164754
security:  5 users, 8 roles, 2043 types, 102 bools, 16 sens, 1024 cats
security:  67 classes, 164754 rules
security:  class peer not defined in policy
security:  permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy
security:  permission sendto in class node not defined in policy
security:  permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy
security:  permission egress in class netif not defined in policy
security:  permission forward_in in class packet not defined in policy
security:  permission forward_out in class packet not defined in policy
SELinux:  Completing initialization.
SELinux:  Setting up existing superblocks.
SELinux: initialized (dev dm-0, type ext3), uses xattr
SELinux: initialized (dev tmpfs, type tmpfs), uses transition SIDs
SELinux: initialized (dev usbfs, type usbfs), uses genfs_contexts
SELinux: initialized (dev debugfs, type debugfs), uses genfs_contexts
SELinux: initialized (dev configfs, type configfs), uses genfs_contexts
SELinux: initialized (dev selinuxfs, type selinuxfs), uses genfs_contexts
SELinux: initialized (dev mqueue, type mqueue), uses transition SIDs
SELinux: initialized (dev devpts, type devpts), uses transition SIDs
SELinux: initialized (dev inotifyfs, type inotifyfs), uses genfs_contexts
SELinux: initialized (dev tmpfs, type tmpfs), uses transition SIDs
SELinux: initialized (dev futexfs, type futexfs), uses genfs_contexts
SELinux: initialized (dev anon_inodefs, type anon_inodefs), uses genfs_contexts
SELinux: initialized (dev pipefs, type pipefs), uses task SIDs
SELinux: initialized (dev sockfs, type sockfs), uses task SIDs
SELinux: initialized (dev proc, type proc), uses genfs_contexts
SELinux: initialized (dev bdev, type bdev), uses genfs_contexts
SELinux: initialized (dev rootfs, type rootfs), uses genfs_contexts
SELinux: initialized (dev sysfs, type sysfs), uses genfs_contexts
SELinux: policy loaded with handle_unknown=deny
type=1403 audit(1200804071.837:2): policy loaded auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295



[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 and SELinux MLS - not playing nice....

[James Morris]

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:17:00 +1100, James Morris said:
> 
> > This looks the same as what akpm hit.  Paul Moore has updated his labeled 
> > networking patches (see Subject: [RFC PATCH v12 00/18] Labeled networking 
> > changes for 2.6.25), and you could try dropping those into the broken out 
> > -mm in place of the existing git patch, or just wait for a new -mm.
> 
> Confirming - I took V12 0-18, cat'ed it into one file, plopped that on top
> of the broken-out/git-lblnet.patch and quilted up a test -rc8-mm1 and that
> booted without complaints - dmesg says:

Thanks for testing this!

> 
> SELinux:8192 avtab hash slots allocated. Num of rules:164754
> SELinux:8192 avtab hash slots allocated. Num of rules:164754
> security:  5 users, 8 roles, 2043 types, 102 bools, 16 sens, 1024 cats
> security:  67 classes, 164754 rules
> security:  class peer not defined in policy
> security:  permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy
> security:  permission sendto in class node not defined in policy
> security:  permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy
> security:  permission egress in class netif not defined in policy
> security:  permission forward_in in class packet not defined in policy
> security:  permission forward_out in class packet not defined in policy
> SELinux:  Completing initialization.
> SELinux:  Setting up existing superblocks.
> SELinux: initialized (dev dm-0, type ext3), uses xattr
> SELinux: initialized (dev tmpfs, type tmpfs), uses transition SIDs
> SELinux: initialized (dev usbfs, type usbfs), uses genfs_contexts
> SELinux: initialized (dev debugfs, type debugfs), uses genfs_contexts
> SELinux: initialized (dev configfs, type configfs), uses genfs_contexts
> SELinux: initialized (dev selinuxfs, type selinuxfs), uses genfs_contexts
> SELinux: initialized (dev mqueue, type mqueue), uses transition SIDs
> SELinux: initialized (dev devpts, type devpts), uses transition SIDs
> SELinux: initialized (dev inotifyfs, type inotifyfs), uses genfs_contexts
> SELinux: initialized (dev tmpfs, type tmpfs), uses transition SIDs
> SELinux: initialized (dev futexfs, type futexfs), uses genfs_contexts
> SELinux: initialized (dev anon_inodefs, type anon_inodefs), uses genfs_contexts
> SELinux: initialized (dev pipefs, type pipefs), uses task SIDs
> SELinux: initialized (dev sockfs, type sockfs), uses task SIDs
> SELinux: initialized (dev proc, type proc), uses genfs_contexts
> SELinux: initialized (dev bdev, type bdev), uses genfs_contexts
> SELinux: initialized (dev rootfs, type rootfs), uses genfs_contexts
> SELinux: initialized (dev sysfs, type sysfs), uses genfs_contexts
> SELinux: policy loaded with handle_unknown=deny
> type=1403 audit(1200804071.837:2): policy loaded auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295
> 
> 
> 

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 and SELinux MLS - not playing nice....

[Paul Moore]

On Sunday 20 January 2008 12:01:41 am Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:17:00 +1100, James Morris said:
> > This looks the same as what akpm hit.  Paul Moore has updated his labeled
> > networking patches (see Subject: [RFC PATCH v12 00/18] Labeled networking
> > changes for 2.6.25), and you could try dropping those into the broken out
> > -mm in place of the existing git patch, or just wait for a new -mm.
>
> Confirming - I took V12 0-18, cat'ed it into one file, plopped that on top
> of the broken-out/git-lblnet.patch and quilted up a test -rc8-mm1 and that
> booted without complaints

Thanks for verifying this fix (and for all of the other testing help you've 
provided recently).

-- 
paul moore
linux security @ hp

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.