From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Cc: lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
hanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: crash in kmem_cache_init
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:41:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080123134147.GA12503@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080123121459.GA18631@aepfle.de>
On (23/01/08 13:14), Olaf Hering didst pronounce:
> On Wed, Jan 23, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > Sorry this is dragging out. Can you post the full dmesg with loglevel=8 of the
> > following patch against 2.6.24-rc8 please? It contains the debug information
> > that helped me figure out what was going wrong on the PPC64 machine here,
> > the revert and the !l3 checks (i.e. the two patches that made machines I
> > have access to work). Thanks
>
> It boots with your change.
>
....... Nice one! As the only addition here is debugging output, I can
only assume that the two patches were being booted in isolation instead
of combination earlier. The two threads have been a little confused with
hand waving so that can easily happen.
Looking at your log;
> early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges
> 1: 0 -> 892928
All memory on node 1
> Online nodes
> o 0
> o 1
> Nodes with regular memory
> o 1
> Current running CPU 0 is associated with node 0
> Current node is 0
Running CPU associated with node 0 so other than being node 1 instead of
node 2, your machine is similar to the one I had the problem on in terms
of memoryless nodes and CPU configuration.
> VFS: Cannot open root device "<NULL>" or unknown-block(0,0)
> Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions:
> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
> Rebooting in 1 seconds..
>
I see it failed to complete boot but I'm going to assume this is a relatively
normal commane-line, .config or initrd problem and not a regression of
some type.
I'll post a patch suitable for pick-up shortly. The two patches ran in
combination with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB a compile-based stress tests without
difficulty so hopefully there is not new surprises hiding in the corners.
Thanks Olaf.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
hanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: crash in kmem_cache_init
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:41:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080123134147.GA12503@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080123121459.GA18631@aepfle.de>
On (23/01/08 13:14), Olaf Hering didst pronounce:
> On Wed, Jan 23, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > Sorry this is dragging out. Can you post the full dmesg with loglevel=8 of the
> > following patch against 2.6.24-rc8 please? It contains the debug information
> > that helped me figure out what was going wrong on the PPC64 machine here,
> > the revert and the !l3 checks (i.e. the two patches that made machines I
> > have access to work). Thanks
>
> It boots with your change.
>
....... Nice one! As the only addition here is debugging output, I can
only assume that the two patches were being booted in isolation instead
of combination earlier. The two threads have been a little confused with
hand waving so that can easily happen.
Looking at your log;
> early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges
> 1: 0 -> 892928
All memory on node 1
> Online nodes
> o 0
> o 1
> Nodes with regular memory
> o 1
> Current running CPU 0 is associated with node 0
> Current node is 0
Running CPU associated with node 0 so other than being node 1 instead of
node 2, your machine is similar to the one I had the problem on in terms
of memoryless nodes and CPU configuration.
> VFS: Cannot open root device "<NULL>" or unknown-block(0,0)
> Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions:
> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
> Rebooting in 1 seconds..
>
I see it failed to complete boot but I'm going to assume this is a relatively
normal commane-line, .config or initrd problem and not a regression of
some type.
I'll post a patch suitable for pick-up shortly. The two patches ran in
combination with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB a compile-based stress tests without
difficulty so hopefully there is not new surprises hiding in the corners.
Thanks Olaf.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
hanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: crash in kmem_cache_init
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:41:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080123134147.GA12503@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080123121459.GA18631@aepfle.de>
On (23/01/08 13:14), Olaf Hering didst pronounce:
> On Wed, Jan 23, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > Sorry this is dragging out. Can you post the full dmesg with loglevel=8 of the
> > following patch against 2.6.24-rc8 please? It contains the debug information
> > that helped me figure out what was going wrong on the PPC64 machine here,
> > the revert and the !l3 checks (i.e. the two patches that made machines I
> > have access to work). Thanks
>
> It boots with your change.
>
....... Nice one! As the only addition here is debugging output, I can
only assume that the two patches were being booted in isolation instead
of combination earlier. The two threads have been a little confused with
hand waving so that can easily happen.
Looking at your log;
> early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges
> 1: 0 -> 892928
All memory on node 1
> Online nodes
> o 0
> o 1
> Nodes with regular memory
> o 1
> Current running CPU 0 is associated with node 0
> Current node is 0
Running CPU associated with node 0 so other than being node 1 instead of
node 2, your machine is similar to the one I had the problem on in terms
of memoryless nodes and CPU configuration.
> VFS: Cannot open root device "<NULL>" or unknown-block(0,0)
> Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions:
> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
> Rebooting in 1 seconds..
>
I see it failed to complete boot but I'm going to assume this is a relatively
normal commane-line, .config or initrd problem and not a regression of
some type.
I'll post a patch suitable for pick-up shortly. The two patches ran in
combination with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB a compile-based stress tests without
difficulty so hopefully there is not new surprises hiding in the corners.
Thanks Olaf.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-23 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 177+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-15 15:09 crash in kmem_cache_init Olaf Hering
2008-01-15 15:58 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-17 12:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-17 12:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-17 12:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-17 14:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-17 14:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-17 14:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-17 18:12 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-17 18:12 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-17 18:12 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-17 18:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-17 18:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-17 18:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-17 19:54 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-17 19:54 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-17 20:20 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-17 20:20 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-17 20:20 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-19 4:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-19 4:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-19 4:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-17 21:15 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-17 21:15 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-17 21:15 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-18 6:56 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-18 6:56 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-18 6:56 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-18 18:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 18:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 18:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-19 4:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-19 4:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-19 4:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 18:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 18:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 18:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 21:30 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-18 21:30 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-18 21:30 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-18 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 22:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 22:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 22:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 22:19 ` Nish Aravamudan
2008-01-18 22:19 ` Nish Aravamudan
2008-01-18 22:19 ` Nish Aravamudan
2008-01-18 22:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 22:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 22:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 22:57 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-18 22:57 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-18 22:57 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-22 19:54 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-22 19:54 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-22 19:54 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-22 20:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 20:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 20:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 21:26 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-22 21:26 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-22 21:26 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-22 21:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 21:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 21:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 22:50 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-22 22:50 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-22 22:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 22:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 22:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 23:10 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-22 23:10 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-22 23:10 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-22 23:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 23:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 23:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 22:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-22 22:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-22 22:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-22 23:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 23:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 23:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 23:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 23:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 23:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 8:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-23 8:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-23 8:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-23 8:40 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 8:40 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 8:40 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-22 21:45 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-22 21:45 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-22 21:45 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-22 22:12 ` Nish Aravamudan
2008-01-22 22:12 ` Nish Aravamudan
2008-01-22 22:12 ` Nish Aravamudan
2008-01-22 22:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 22:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-22 22:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 7:58 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 7:58 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 7:58 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 10:50 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-23 10:50 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-23 10:50 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-23 12:14 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 12:14 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 12:14 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 12:52 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 12:52 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 12:52 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 13:55 ` [PATCH] Fix boot problem in situations where the boot CPU is running on a memoryless node Mel Gorman
2008-01-23 13:55 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-23 13:55 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-23 14:18 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 14:18 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 14:18 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 14:32 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 14:32 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 14:32 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 14:49 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 14:49 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 14:49 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 15:56 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-23 15:56 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-23 15:56 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-23 17:29 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 17:29 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 17:29 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 17:42 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 17:42 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 17:42 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-23 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 19:52 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-01-23 19:52 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-01-23 19:52 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-01-23 21:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-23 21:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-23 21:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-23 21:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 21:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 21:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 21:36 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-01-23 21:36 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-01-23 21:36 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-01-24 3:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-24 3:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-24 3:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 18:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 18:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 18:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 18:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 18:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 18:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 14:27 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 14:27 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 14:27 ` Olaf Hering
2008-01-23 14:42 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-23 14:42 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-23 14:42 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-23 18:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 18:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 18:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-23 13:41 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2008-01-23 13:41 ` crash in kmem_cache_init Mel Gorman
2008-01-23 13:41 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-18 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-17 19:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-17 19:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-17 19:03 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080123134147.GA12503@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.