From: Adrian Bunk <trivial@kernel.org>
To: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>
Cc: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] bfs: remove multiple assignments
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:08:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080127140814.GA1916@does.not.exist> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0801261833270.1966@ginsburg.homenet>
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 06:35:41PM +0000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
>> - inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
>> + inode->i_mtime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
>> + inode->i_atime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
>> + inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
>
> multiple assignments like "x = y = z = value;" can potentially (depending
> on the compiler and arch) be faster than "x = value; y = value; z=value;"
Only depending on the compiler, and recent gcc versions are quite good
at optimizing code.
> I am surprized that this script complains about them as it is a perfectly
> valid thing to do in C.
Checkpatch warns about the something already documented in
Documentation/CodingStyle:
<-- snip -->
Don't put multiple assignments on a single line either. Kernel coding style
is super simple. Avoid tricky expressions.
<-- snip -->
Nobody claims it wasn't perfectly valid C code, the point is that
multiple assignments on a single line are harder to read.
> But this is not a "big deal", so I don't mind.
>
> Kind regards
> Tigran
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-27 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-25 21:20 [PATCH v2 0/9] bfs: assorted cleanups Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-25 21:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] bfs: remove a useless variable Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-25 21:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] bfs: coding style cleanup in fs/bfs/inode.c Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-25 21:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] bfs: coding style cleanup in fs/bfs/bfs.h Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-25 21:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] bfs: coding style cleanup in fs/bfs/dir.c Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-25 21:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] bfs: move function prototype to the proper header file Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-25 21:20 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] bfs: coding style cleanup in fs/bfs/file.c Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-25 21:20 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] bfs: coding style cleanup in include/linux/bfs_fs.h Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-25 21:20 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] bfs: remove multiple assignments Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-26 18:35 ` Tigran Aivazian
2008-01-26 21:32 ` Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-26 23:48 ` Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-28 7:02 ` Joel Schopp
2008-01-30 13:06 ` Al Viro
2008-01-30 13:36 ` Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-27 14:08 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-01-27 14:39 ` Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-25 21:20 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] bfs: use the proper header file for inclusion Dmitri Vorobiev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080127140814.GA1916@does.not.exist \
--to=trivial@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.